The study found that children from these unions face a three-fold increase in the likelihood of taking antidepressants and a two-fold increase in taking antipsychotics. For purposes of the study, taking an antidepressant or antianxiety drug was a stand-in for having a mood disorder and taking an antipsychotic represented conditions with a psychotic component, such as schizophrenia.
First cousins share a pair of grandparents, and as a result, have in common at least one-eighth of their gene variants. It’s very unlikely to inherit two copies of a recessive gene that is extremely rare in a large population – that’s why it’s extremely rare – but not so unlikely when identical mutations come from a father and mother who in turn inherited it from grandma.
A good example of the increased risk of inheriting a rare disease in an inbred family comes from one of my favorite books, the Pulitzer Prize-winning fictional novel Middlesex, by Jeffrey Eugenides. Protagonist Cal’s grandparents, who were brother and sister, wed aboard a ship fleeing the Greco-Turkish war, in 1922. Each carried a recessive mutation for 5-alpha reductase deficiency, in which XY individuals appear female from a blockage in the male sex hormone pathway. Due to a cousin-cousin marriage in the second generation, Cal inherited the condition.
A partial pedigree of Egypt’s Ptolemy dynasty is so riddled with relatives marrying relatives – called consanguinity, for “shared blood” – that it looks like a ladder. The double lines indicate relatives marrying relatives. From 323 B.C. to Cleopatra’s death in 30 B.C., the family had one pairing between cousins related through half-brothers, four brother-sister pairings, and an uncle-niece marriage. Cleopatra married her brother, Ptolemy XIII, when he was 10 years old! The inbreeding was an effort to preserve the “royal blood.”
But as mentioned earlier, inheritance of mental disorders is harder to trace than single-gene traits or diseases.
Aideen Maguire, PhD, of Queen’s University in Belfast and colleagues compared prescription medication records of everyone born in Northern Ireland from 1971 through 1986 and information on whether the parents were blood relatives. They followed up on 363,960 people still in the nation in 2014, and considered prescription of psychotropic medications and use for at least three months since 2010.
Only 609, or 0.2 percent, of the parents were blood relatives, which is similar to other populations. After accounting for environmental factors associated with compromised mental health for Northern Ireland (low birth weight, birth order, parental age, social deprivation, and living in a rural area), the researchers found that children of first-cousin parents were 3.01 times as likely to take antidepressants or antianxiety meds and 2.13 times as likely to take antipsychotics compared to children whose parents weren’t related.
But the risks are relative. For example, the lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia is 0.30 percent to 0.66 percent. Doubling that for a child of cousins is still a low number. The numbers are more alarming for depression, with a 10 percent lifetime risk in the general population tripling in cousins’ kids. The researchers conclude, “A child of consanguineous parents is at increased risk of common mood disorders and psychoses.”
Western nations tend to take a dim view of marrying blood relatives, but it’s an accepted practice in many nations and cultures. The 2011 report from the Geneva International Consanguinity Workshop lists the percentage of consanguineous marriages in several regions: 25-30 percent in Afghanistan, 14-24 percent in Egypt, 7-42 percent in south India, and 44-49 percent in Sudan, to name a few.
Consanguineous relationships are most often between cousins or between uncles and nieces. When inbred families migrate, they bring the closed genetic community with them. For example, marriage between first cousins occurs in about a third of the Pakistani community in England, a population that researchers have been following to track birth defect rate, which is about double, but still less than 4 percent of births.
Many of the rare genetic diseases described in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, the “bible” of genetics, indicate inbred relationships, such as this entry for Joubert syndrome: “In the children of healthy, consanguineous Turkish parents, van Dorp et al. observed a severely retarded male child with neurologic anomalies.” Marriage among blood relatives is a question I always ask genetic counseling patients.
Sometimes blood relatives can have children together and not know they’re related. This tends to happen in “endogamous” communities in which people come from the same place. An orthopedic condition, Steel syndrome, for example, is much more common among residents of East Harlem of Puerto Rican ancestry than it is among people of other Hispanic origins. Noting the symptoms in a person of Puerto Rican ancestry can alert doctors to avoid a hip surgery that can harm someone with Steel syndrome, but help others.
A more modern consanguineous circumstance arises from families using the same sperm donor. See “Accidental incest between donor-conceived people.”
Even though theoretically the sharing of 1 in 8 genes suggests that genetic disease will be more common among the consanguineous, incidence of such illnesses is lower than predicted. Some studies show that cousins tend to share different hunks of their genomes, which would counter the pairing of “identical-by-descent” pathogenic genes in offspring.
Another possible protection is that natural selection ditched dangerous gene variants by preventing sick individuals from reproducing. This may have happened to the cheetah, a highly inbred species whose numbers plummeted through population bottlenecks. About 4,000 of the animals living mostly in six southern Africa countries today seem rather healthy, despite the fact that they are so closely related that most could swap organs with nary a rejection reaction. Natural selection might have kept the healthiest genes.
Getting back to people, Charles Darwin studied consanguinity among inmates of lunatic asylums and found no greater representation. He was perhaps especially attuned to inbreeding because his family practiced it. He married his first cousin and his family had many other relatives-marrying-relatives. But the three of Darwin’s ten children who died young had infectious diseases – which could have reflected poor immune responses or close proximity easing transmission.
Flaws in the study
Psychotropic drugs are not exact proxies for the associated conditions – they’re often prescribed off-label. The same drug, for example, was prescribed for my father, who had severe psychotic depression, and another relative who is just sad to be in a nursing home.
A second issue is the assumption that all consanguineous relationships are equal in terms of funneling disease-causing gene variants into the same descendants. The degree of genetic uniformity is much different for a pair of cousins who fall in love and marry at a young age, the only relatives in the extended family to do so, compared to populations that arise from many generations of uncle-niece and cousin-cousin couples, tying pedigrees up in slanted steps and loops of connectivity. And the investigators didn’t consider whether or not the parents had mental illnesses – just that they were cousins.
The third and most disturbing issue to arise from the new study is the possibility of the findings fueling a self-fulfilling prophecy towards a mood disorder, anxiety, or psychosis. The situation isn’t the same as the predictable 25 percent risk of an autosomal recessive disease in a child of two carrier parents, with easy-to-identify symptoms and confirmatory genetic testing available.
Might the headlines and memes that are likely to reverberate from the new report propel someone who knows her parents are first cousins to fit how she feels into the suggested paradigm of depression, or bipolar disorder, or even schizophrenia? Genetic determinism, the idea that genes underlie nearly everything, can be helpful or harmful. I hope that the new findings lead some people to seek help, but that they don’t also induce panic in or stigmatize others.
Ricki Lewis is the GLP’s senior contributing writer focusing on gene therapy and gene editing. She has a PhD in genetics and is a genetic counselor, science writer and author of The Forever Fix: Gene Therapy and the Boy Who Saved It, the only popular book about gene therapy. BIO. Follow her at her website or Twitter @rickilewis.