Canadians divided on GMO safety but most support labeling, survey finds

gmolabel fblink
Image source: Center for Food Safety

If there’s one clear finding that emerges from a new study on genetically modified food in Canada, it’s that Canadians are confused about it.

A survey of consumer attitudes about genetic engineering plant-based and animal-based foods released Thursday [May 24] finds that the majority of Canadians — 56.3 per cent — believe that genetically modified (GM) food is thoroughly tested before it reaches consumers, compared with just 16 per cent who disagree.

But at the same time, Canadians are deeply divided on the safety of genetically modified plants, animals and food products, according to new data from Dalhousie University.

The survey of 1,049 Canadians found that 37.7 per cent believe GM food is safe to consume, while 34.7 per cent believe it is not safe to eat and 27.6 didn’t have an opinion on its safety. Thirty-five per cent of those surveyed said the health effects of GM food are fully understood, while 44 per cent said they disagreed.

…

“People who are supportive of biotechnology would argue that there is little risk (from GM food), and it’s true — from a food safety perspective, the science is very clear,” said [Sylvain Charlebois, dean of management at Dalhousie University and lead author of the study], who believes GM food should nevertheless be labelled.

The survey found that 88.6 per cent of respondents said GMO food and ingredients should be labelled as such in Canada.

Read full, original post: Canadians deeply divided over genetically modified food, study shows

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-2.41.21-PM
Viewpoint: 7-OH controversy: An opioid is available over-the-counter–even at gas stations. Should we be concerned?
Screenshot-2026-09-24-at-3.25.18-PM
No, organic eggs are not more nutritious or necessarily healthier than regular eggs. They are far more expensive.
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_36_56-AM
Now AI almost started a war with China
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-11_17_31-AM
The exploding controversy over AI’s built-in survival drive
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-10_36_43-AM
New federal autism committee head has financial ties to leucovorin
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_57_15-AM
RFK, Jr. likely violated federal ethics guidelines in accepting more than $4,275,000 in gifts and book advances from MAHA allies
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-10.27.33-AM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS poised to address First Amendment tension between mandatory vaccines, children’s health and religious freedom 
Woman_Vaping_Electronic_Cigarette_50687233623
Trump administration clears the way for speedy approvals of once-restricted tobacco vapes and pouches
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-27-2026-10_00_17-AM
Current and future RFK Jr. aides criticize his science-rejectionist vaccine views
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.