The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our 2019 Annual Report

Viewpoint: Genetic intelligence tests are ‘worse than just wrong’

| | June 6, 2018
genetics w h
Image credit: Mario Tama/Getty Images
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

On a recent visit to [genetic data website] DNA.Land, I scanned down the list of traits they offered to tell me about [my own DNA]. I stopped at intelligence. I took a breath before I clicked.

The bell curve was surrounded by notes, disclaimers, and symbols. But my eye stayed locked on that lavender hill—especially on that personalized marker that located me on the low side of the scale. What was I to make of this?

I called up Yaniv Erlich, the scientist who wrote the intelligence program.


Erlich explained that he designed the program to make people cautious about the connection between genes and intelligence. All those disclaimers and notes that surrounded the bell curve were intended to show that these predictions are, in a sense, worse than just wrong. They’re practically meaningless.

Related article:  Why your dog really can tell if you are sick

[W]ith millions of people flocking to sites like 23andMe and to get reports on their genes, we have to wonder what will happen if they start handing out intelligence predictions. After talking with Erlich, I fear it will turn out badly.

Read full, original post: Genetic Intelligence Tests Are Next to Worthless

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend