Seeking a new path for FDA regulation of revolutionary medical treatments

FDA

Researchers are developing therapies that could permanently alter a patient’s genes… . The early results are promising. Patients would live longer, better lives. …the potential savings for insurers—and for Medicaid—are enormous. But when?

Part of the answer depends on the Food and Drug Administration, where hundreds of applications involving gene therapy for various diseases are pending.

“It used to be that the model was to develop a drug that was going to be administered chronically over the life of a patient,” [FDA Commissioner Scott] Gottlieb says in a recent interview at the FDA’s headquarters. … And now, the model is to try to develop curative therapy,” usually a short course or a one-time treatment. “It’s a completely different therapeutic model. It’s a completely different payment model, and our payment system isn’t adapted to that.”

Related article:  Genetic tests by Inova draw warning letter from FDA, citing potential for 'serious health consequences'

Is the regulatory system? The FDA is used to reviewing synthetic chemical drugs, but much of the innovation today is in “biologics,” treatments derived from living things, a category that includes genetic therapies. …

The FDA already has a route known as “accelerated approval” for drugs whose trial results are believed “reasonably likely” to predict clinical benefit. The early approval is then intended to be cemented over time with long-term data. Dr. Gottlieb says this process is well-suited to the new challenge of genetic therapies.

Read full, original post: When Medical Innovation Meets Politics

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend