Designed for distraction: Why our brains find it difficult to focus

distracted

Laser focus leads to success, or so they say. Except it actually doesn’t. Researchers have found that rather than being laser-like, attention is actually more akin to a spotlight that continually dims and comes back on again.

The researchers found that in between those bursts of attention, we are actually distracted. During those periods of distraction, the brain pauses and scans the environment to see if there is something outside the primary focus of attention that might be more important. If there is not, it re-focus back to what you were doing.

“The brain can’t process everything in the environment,” explains [researcher] Ian Fiebelkorn.

So why does our brain make us go through attention pulses at such a fast rate? The researchers suggest that it corresponds to an evolutionary advantage. “Think about when life was more dangerous,” Fiebelkorn says. “You would have to constantly be on the lookout, you would want to always be aware if there was something around you with bigger teeth.”

In modern life, this particular feature of the brain allows us to realise, for instance, that a car is coming as we are crossing the street. Our spotlight of attention, in this sense, has been and still is key to our survival.

Read full, original post: Here’s scientific proof your brain was designed to be distracted

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-11_00_13-AM-2
Glucosamine alert: Alzheimer’s progresses faster among those taking the popular supplement
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-12_13_41-PM
Viewpoint: Behind the effort to re-purpose the tobacco attack strategy to fight ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-3-2026-04_29_13-PM
Viewpoint: While unvaccinated children are dying overseas, Congress challenges Trump and Kennedy’s block on aid
Screenshot-2026-06-12-at-2.10.55-PM
Physician warns online statin myths delay care and raise heart risk
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.14.26-AM
‘Humanitarian catastrophe’: Trump’s USAID shutdown could help drive nearly 23 million deaths — including 5.4 million children — by 2030, Lancet study warns
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-10_42_06-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Steroid Olympics’ marketing stunt: ‘It seemed less like a sporting event and more like a loss leader to peddle testosterone injections, GLP-1s, and peptides’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-14-2026-09_41_44-AM-2
Viewpoint—‘The gleeful efficiency of an arsonist’: Administration’s health and science research cuts are ‘sabotaging’ America’s future
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.