Why China’s willingness to push ethical boundaries with CRISPR research ‘could end up benefiting us all’

aeba d c ac b d ae
Two beagles (Hercules, left, and Tangou, right) were genetically-modified in a lab in China to be more muscular. Image: Zou Qingjian/Lai Liangxue/Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Today, [China] serves as the global center for CRISPR animal experiments, with its scientists being the first to use the tool to edit the genes of rats, rabbits, dogs, monkeys, and other species — often to give them painful diseases, ranging from muscular dystrophy to cancer.

Such experiments are highly controversial in the United States, where public opinion polls show that more than half of people oppose the use of animals for scientific research altogether. However, they’re embraced by both the Chinese public and its government — and ultimately, that could end up benefiting us all.

China’s CRISPR animal experiments have the potential to lead to cures for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or any number of human diseases. They could help scientists figure out how to grow replacement organs for humans, putting an end to long transplant waiting lists.

Chinese scientists are already engineering animals that are resistant to disease, which could increase the global food supply and perhaps end world hunger altogether.

Unfortunately, those advances will come at the cost of animals’ lives — and right now, that’s a price China appears willing to pay, even if other nations aren’t.

Read full, original post: China Isn’t Afraid to Be the “Bad Guy” of CRISPR Research

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-02_20_13-PM
How RFK, Jr.’s false vaccine claims are holding up $600 million to fight diseases in poor countries
viva-la-vida-watermelons
Misinformation and climate change are endangering summer watermelons
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Drinking lots of water can help reduce the effects of aging
Nanoplastics in drinking water: MAHA activists forge science-based bipartisan coalition 
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.