Can this new blood test can predict your death 5-10 years before it happens?

blood test
Image: Shutterstock

Though predicting an exact day is far from likely, an experimental blood test may be able to tell an individual’s risk of dying in the next five to 10 years.

Researchers in Europe made a predictive tool using data from more than 44,000 individuals ages 18 through 109 years old, 5,500 of whom died during the study period. They identified 14 different substances from participants’ blood samples that were associated with a risk of death — such as blood sugar, lipid particles that transport “bad” cholesterol throughout the body, and albumin, a protein made by the liver that keeps fluid in your bloodstream so it doesn’t leak into tissues. When these substances get higher or lower, they can be indicative of certain health problems, like Type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

Using those 14 indicators, the researchers built a model that predicts the likelihood that a person will die in five to 10 years. In a new study published [August 20] in Nature Communications, they report the prediction accuracy was around 83% overall. 

Eventually, middle-aged and elderly people might get a death predictor test at a routine checkup or when they’re hospitalized to help doctors guide treatment and recommend preventive measures.

Read full, original post: Want to Know When You’ll Die? A New Blood Test May Hold the Answer

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-07-08-at-9.36.03-AM
Viewpoint: Long-contained diseases are on the rise in the U.S. Are Trump cuts to blame?
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
Viewpoint: Consensus as truth? How ‘misinformation police’ control policy narratives
Which among war, weather and cyber attacks is the biggest world threat? None of the above. It’s misinformation, and here’s why.
c9f0a584-46e9-4dd8-9a77-f5f5a7a51a84
Across Eastern Europe, science disinformation has spread far beyond COVID and vaccine denialism. Here’s the grim list.
Screenshot 2026-07-11 100209
Viewpoint: Supplements to clean your liver? Not a good idea.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-01_57_55-PM
Viewpoint: Europe’s rejection of air conditioning is the poster child for misunderstanding how to mitigate the impact of climate change
Gemini_Generated_Image_gabo48gabo48gabo
Viewpoint: A plastic surgeon on why banning gender-transition surgery without further research is wrong and harmful
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-3.10.50-PM
Snake-oil cures throughout history
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-12_37_08-PM
Viewpoint: Trump poised to politicize all U.S.-supported science research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.