CRISPR prime editing: Broad Institute biochemist David Liu discusses pros, cons and off-target effects

p p y unnamed
Image: David Liu

STAT invited readers to submit questions to [biochemist David] Liu on the new [CRISPR prime] technology. He also received some questions directly. From his perch at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Liu answered:

…

Zoe A.: Can you please compare the pros and cons of prime editing versus base editing?

…

[Liu:] We directly compared prime editors and base editors in our study, and found that current base editors can offer higher editing efficiency and fewer indel byproducts than prime editors, while prime editors offer more targeting flexibility and greater editing precision.

…

Anonymous: Are unintended on- and off-target effects likely to be more or less of an issue with the new method compared with other methods?

[Liu:] We show in our study a side-by-side comparison of off-target editing between Cas9 nuclease and prime editing at known Cas9 off-target sites, with the result that prime editing is far less prone to off-target editing at known Cas9 off-target sites. Of course, these observations do not necessarily mean that prime editors will not have their own off-target activities, and additional studies are needed to study this possibility.

Read full, original post: You had questions for David Liu about CRISPR, prime editing, and advice to young scientists. He has answers

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Reaching Through the Woven Sky
Challenging genetic modification rejectionists: Our evolving food system has relied on science for thousands of years
Screenshot-2026-11-03-at-12.31.18-PM
Gene editing once viewed with suspicion by UK  farmers, upwards of 90% now open to their sustainability benefits
Smiling-Woman-Over-Teal-Abstract-Shapes
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s latest foray into junk science: Even Kennedy’s hand-picked NIH director balks at appointment of crackpot mental health director
Neon Genome_ Fetal Dreamscape
The race to genetically engineer babies
Glossy Plastic Bag of Tokens and Labels
Viewpoint: How CNN got played by environmental activists pushing a plastics scare and litigation agenda
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-11-02-at-11.34.28-AM
Farmers are collateral damage in the PFAS “forever chemicals” crossfire. Here’s what they need to know.
Screenshot-2026-10-29-at-11.18.34-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Just the flu’: Skipping your child’s flu shot could be a fatal mistake
Screenshot-2026-10-28-at-3.00.44-PM
Viewpoint: Activist attacks on corporations increasingly depend on "attribution" science to target oil companies for global climate change
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
Red and Green Embroidered Campaign Caps
Viewpoint: The fragile (and often bizarre) MAHA-MAGA-far left health-and-chemicals coalition is fracturing. Here’s why
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.