We depend on bees for 1/3 of our food? Pesticides threaten bees? Farmer challenges pollinator myths

| | June 29, 2020
Credit: iStock
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

…. [W]ithout [bee] pollination efforts, the world would still have plenty of food …. The vegetables we eat don’t require pollination (except tomatoes, which are technically a fruit), but producing seed from which the veggies are grown requires pollinators. Most fruits and nuts require pollinators in order to get a good crop, but wind is also a pollinator. Same goes for melons and berries.

[Editor’s note: Jack DeWitt is a farmer-agronomist with farming experience that spans the decades.]

So the truth is, we could get by without insect pollination, but some fruits and vegetables could get scarce and expensive, and our diet could get a little boring. But no way is 1/3 of our food supply dependent on bees.

Related article:  Sensationalist news on bees, neonicotinoids, 'junk science' leads to bad policy

The other common point made about honeybees spread in the press is that they are declining, with losses as high as 30 percent or more each year. While it is true that beekeepers have suffered more than normal losses the past several winters, the losses are often made up over the summer — though at extra cost — and worldwide, honeybee hive numbers have never lost upward momentum.

Some …. lay the blame for [colony collapse disorder] on neonicotinide insecticides, also called neonics …. Some studies have blamed neonics for CCD, but peer reviewers claim the experimental methods used don’t represent the “real world.” Other studies have exonerated neonics ….

Read the original post

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend