Life with the pandemic: 4 ways our bodies might respond to new COVID waves

covid
[Coronavirus researcher Vineet] Menachery laid out four possible scenarios for how humans might interact with SARS-2 over time — in other words, what kind of immunity we might expect.

…

Sterilizing immunity would be a best-case scenario. It describes an immune system that is armed against a foe, able to fend it off before infection can take hold. Diseases that we think of as “one-and-done” infections induce such a robust and durable immune response in a single encounter that we cannot be reinfected.

…

Functional immunity, on the other hand, may be within reach. In fact, it’s the scenario Menachery sees as most likely.

Under this scenario, people whose immune systems have been primed to recognize and fight the virus — whether through infection or vaccination — could contract it again in the future. But these infections would be cut short as the immune system’s defenses kick into gear.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Waning infection, the third scenario, is a variation of functional immunity. In this scenario, people who have been infected or vaccinated would lose their protection over time.

…

Lost immunity describes a scenario in which people who have been infected would lose all their immune munitions against the virus within some time frame. A reinfection after that point would be like a first infection… None of the experts who spoke to STAT felt this was a possibility.

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-02_36_39-PM
Viewpoint: After firing the entire National Science Board, Trump reshapes funding initiatives. Here’s the good and the bad.
generated-1790707585414
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
Screenshot-2026-09-29-at-11.06.43-AM
Astrology, homeopathy, vaccine rejectionism, creationism: Why pseudoscience thrives as science advances
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-2.41.21-PM
Viewpoint: 7-OH controversy: An opioid is available over-the-counter–even at gas stations. Should we be concerned?
Screenshot-2026-09-25-at-9.24.04-AM
What constitutes a measles death? RFK, Jr. maneuvers to restrict definition to make pandemic seem less dire
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-11_17_31-AM
The exploding controversy over AI’s built-in survival drive
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-28-2026-11_51_41-AM
Energy-sucking data centers are unpopular across the political spectrum. Could moving them into space change the equation?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-25-2026-11_36_56-AM
Now AI almost started a war with China
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.