Bayer asks federal judge to toss lawsuit demanding cancer warning label on glyphosate weedkiller

unnamed file
Credit: James Copeland/Dreamstime

Monsanto is again asking a Delaware judge to toss a lawsuit that demands a cancer warning label on its weedkiller Roundup, despite both the federal government and state of California determining that wouldn’t be appropriate.

The company on Jan. 26 filed its second motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought by Scott Gilmore in Delaware federal court, with this most recent one targeting Gilmore’s amended complaint.

Gilmore’s case claims a warning label was required even though a California judge has ruled it was wrong to place one of the state’s infamous Prop 65 warnings on it and the federal Environmental Protection Agency has determined the product doesn’t cause cancer.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Gilmore doesn’t allege he has contracted non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the disease with an alleged link to active ingredient glyphosate that is the subject of thousands of lawsuits.

Nearly every regulatory body in the world says glyphosate does not cause cancer, with the exception of the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Its former non-voting chairman, Chris Portier, signed on as a paid plaintiff expert shortly after IARC reached its conclusion.

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Supplement Rain Wellness Illustration
Viewpoint: Bedeviled by “toxic inflammation”? How wellness grifters turn this scientific gray zone into a supplement jackpot
Teal Hexagon Technology Icons
4 key ways the Blue Wave will upend science policy
Confident Doctor in Clinical Setting
More than 80% of ‘pro-science’ candidates were swept into office. Will they have a policy impact?
Stacked Protest Signs on Concrete Ledge
Voters hate AI data centers, yet they are crucial to establishing a critical technology. So what’s next?
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Screenshot-2026-11-05-at-1.20.54-PM
$7.35 billion PFAS settlement: 3M to pay people who blame health problems on ‘forever chemicals’ phased out of firefighting foam for more than 20 years
Protect-Womens-Sports-at-the-Capitol
Blue, purple and red states passed or reaffirmed bans on trans females competing in women’s sports
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.