An instinct for numbers? Ancient humans and even some animals evolved the ability to count

Prehistoric accounting? Markings made on a hyena bone by a Neanderthal might have recorded numerical information. Credit: Nature
Prehistoric accounting? Markings made on a hyena bone by a Neanderthal might have recorded numerical information. Credit: Nature

Although researchers once thought that humans were the only species with a sense of quantity, studies since the mid-twentieth century have revealed that many animals share the ability. For instance, fish, bees and newborn chicks can instantly recognize quantities up to four, a skill known as subitizing.

Six-month-old human infants also show a similar appreciation of quantity, even before they have had significant exposure to human culture or language.

What all of this suggests, says Andreas Nieder, a neuroscientist at the University of Tรผbingen, Germany, is that humans have an innate appreciation of numbers. That arose through evolutionary processes such as natural selection, he says.

In societies with complex number systems, there were clues to how those systems developed. Significantly, [cognitive archaeologist Karenleigh] Overmann noted that it was common for these societies to use quinary (base 5), decimal or vigesimal (base 20) systems. This suggested to her that many number systems began with a finger-counting stage.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The societies that moved beyond finger-counting did so, argues Overmann, because they developed a clearer social need for numbers. Perhaps most obviously, a society with more material possessions has a greater need to count (and to count much higher than โ€˜fourโ€™) to keep track of objects.

Read the original post

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
Screenshot 2026-02-25 at 11.20
Why the herbicide glyphosate is key to sustainable agriculture
screen shot at pm
Word games: How Moderna is selling its newest vaccine without using the โ€œvโ€ word
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-28-2026-12_46_14-PM-2
Kennedy has quietly stopped touting problematic raw milk. Health concerns arenโ€™t why
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_57_31-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Science-as-Satanโ€™ unites the MAHAโ€”MAGA movements. Is a breakup in the works?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your healthย 
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.