Excavations in Israel have sparked renewed debate over why Homo erectus migrated out of Africa

What exactly pushed—or pulled—H. erectus out of Africa is a matter of fierce debate.

Was it some innate adaptability, such as social learning, curiosity, a taste for meat, or technological acuity? Did the expansion of grasslands or rapid changes in climate send them on their journey? Or was it some combination of these factors?

…

H. erectus was not simply following spreading savanna as the climate changed but rather had the capacity to adjust to a variety of environments.

“The course of human evolutionary history has been a ratcheting up of different abilities to occupy a variety of environments,” says paleoanthropologist Rick Potts, the head of the Smithsonian Institution’s Human Origins Program, “of eating a greater variety of foods, of being able to respond cognitively and socially to a wider variety of situations.”

Related on the SLP

African genes are not well represented in research databases. Here’s why that’s a problem Viewpoint: Here’s why it’s ‘moronic’ to suggest that Homo erectus was lazy

Viewpoint: The shocking consequences after a year of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s distortions, deceptions, and flat-out falsehoods

Retreat from identity labels: Does the sharply declining number of young teens identifying as gay and bisexual reflect an ideological shift?

MAHA moms divided over RFK Jr.’s food‑safety efforts, as recall alerts grow and outbreaks spread

He notes that by around 1.4 to 1.6 million years ago, H. erectus was occupying tropical Southeast Asia and Indonesia. “That also by itself is an indicator that it’s not just one type of habitat that is being followed.”

But Potts believes there was an urgent trigger that spurred adaptations: periods of highly variable climate.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.