Viewpoint: Green lobby in full swing as activist NGOs flood European Commission with pre-fabricated, anti-biotechnology propaganda

Credit: European Public Health Alliance
Credit: European Public Health Alliance

Before legislative procedures, the EU regularly asks for the opinions of its citizens and stakeholders. In principle, anyone can participate in these consultations, including non-European citizens. A consultation on new plant breeding technologies [ended] October 22, 2021. The Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA) group in the European Parliament, as well as some anti-GMO NGOs, have hijacked this consultation by introducing thousands of pre-formulated comments.

As of [October 24], more than 65,000 comments [in the end: 70,894] have been submitted on the topic “Legislation applicable to plants produced using certain new genomic techniques,” of which 44% came from Germany. By comparison, the consultation on “Protection of the marine environment – review of EU rules,” ended on 21 October 2021 and received 120 comments, 15% of which are from Germany according to official statistics. How is it possible?

The Verts / ALE group and other organizations, including the Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft, the Aurelia Foundation, the Gen-ethische Informationsdienst, Demeter, IFOAM, Save our Seeds, GM Watch, the association Umweltinstitut München eV and Slowfood, use the Proca APP application, a campaign tool that makes it easy to generate ready-to-use text modules and collect data. 

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in French and has been translated and edited for clarity.]

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
covid-vaccine
Blocked by Kennedy’s CDC, validated by peer-reviewed scientists: Suppressed COVID vaccine study published in JAMA finds 50% risk cut
Sampling_a_strawberry_32206461974
Viewpoint: Which is worse: Trace PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ on strawberries or the fear that scares people away from eating them?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
NYPICHPDPICT000011561063
Viewpoint: From magnetizing your head to taking useless supplements, the wellness craze has morphed into an obsession of the affluent
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-4.08.41-PM
Even in blue states, hospitals have continued to drop gender-affirming care for youths
Podolay_1_transplantacia_srdca_1968
From printers to pigs: The precarious future of organ transplants
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-01_21_33-PM
How the dubious, Trump-backed, addictive drug kratom could enrich cabinet secretary Markwayne Mullin
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-11.18.03-AM
Viewpoint: Appreciating a simpler past without swallowing the misleading ‘nature is healthier and safer’ myth
Screenshot-2026-06-26-at-10.14.50-AM
Viewpoint: The facts behind the grifter-promoting wellness and anti-aging peptide craze: Don’t waste your money
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-11_34_33-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s vaccine subterfuge campaign now flies below the media radar
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.