GLP Podcast: Monsanto owns farmers? Evolution of pet parenting; Soylent abandons GMO advocacy

Does Monsanto control the seeds Mexico’s farmers can grow? No, but anti-GMO groups do. An increasing number of Americans don’t have children and instead treat their pets like kids. Is there an evolutionary explanation for this phenomenon? Meal-replacement company Soylent once vocally celebrated its use of genetically engineered soy in its products. But the company has suddenly gone silent about GMOs in its marketing, fueling speculation that the drink maker has permanently pulled away from its “pro-science” messaging.

Join geneticist Kevin Folta and GLP contributor Cameron English on episode 146 of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down these latest news stories:

 Anti-GMO groups often assert that seed companies, Monsanto being the most notorious, dictate the kinds of products farmers can use. As it turns out, the activists themselves often exercise this power over the people who grow our food. In Mexico, for instance, the government has banned biotech crops, under the influence of public officials affiliated with anti-GMO advocacy groups. The growers themselves are actually quite happy to utilize biotechnology to reduce their pesticide use and increase their crop yields.

Starting a family appears to be going out of fashion as more people begin treating their dogs and cats like their children. Some research suggests that humans evolved a capacity to care for children who aren’t their own as a means of establishing basic communities. Now, some evolutionary psychologists suspect this altruistic trait, known as alloparenting, explains why many people consider their animals to be their “fur babies.” Is this a reasonable hypothesis?
Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Soylent used to brag in its ads and on its packaging that it was “proudly pro-GMO.” Recently, though, the company has changed its tone. Any references to GMOs have been removed from its advertising and product labels. It even deleted old blog posts from its website that discussed the science of genetic engineering. What motivated the company’s decision? Did Soylent shy away from an important cause, or was this a shrewd business move?

Kevin M. Folta is a professor, keynote speaker and podcast host. Follow Professor Folta on Twitter @kevinfolta

Cameron J. English is the director of bio-sciences at the American Council on Science and Health. Visit his website and follow ACSH on Twitter @ACSHorg

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
skin microbiome x final

Infographic: Could gut bacteria help us diagnose and treat diseases? This is on the horizon thanks to CRISPR gene editing

Humans are never alone. Even in a room devoid of other people, they are always in the company of billions ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.