What’s next for glyphosate cases? Bayer’s hopes US Supreme Court would overturn Roundup liability verdicts dims as US Department of Justice asks SCOTUS to reject company’s cancer claims appeal

Credit: Mike Blake/Reuters
Credit: Mike Blake/Reuters

Bayer’s latest legal setback in its Roundup saga looks equally toxic to American justice. Shares in the German drugs-to-agrochemicals group fell 7% on [May 11] after the U.S. government asked the Supreme Court not to hear a case relating to claims that the weedkiller causes cancer.

A favourable ruling was one of Chief Executive Werner Baumann’s big hopes. He has already set aside up to $15 billion to settle the claims. Obviously, not getting into the court doesn’t help.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

It’s also hurtful to the U.S. legal system. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar’s advice is a reversal from the previous administration, which backed Bayer. That increases the chances of the court setting aside its tendency to heed the government’s views on what should and shouldn’t be heard.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.