Viewpoint: Evidence does not support ‘plant good, animal bad’ mantra. Humans are hard-wired to eat meat

Credit: Lightspring via Shutterstock
Credit: Lightspring via Shutterstock

While some question whether humans are supposed to eat meat, a University of Melbourne professor in food science and human nutrition says the archaeological record is unequivocal.

“Clear and abundant” evidence exists that hominins, our ancestors, began eating meat about four million years ago, Professor Neil Mann explained during a presentation to the recent Societal Role of Meat Summit in Dublin.

Not only was this necessary to enable early humans to survive the move from jungles to savannah environments, it also led to physiological and biochemical changes, enabling humans to evolve larger brains while expending less energy on digestion.

While our jungle dwelling pre-human ancestors were predominantly plant eaters, this was not an option in the more open savannah grasslands where grasses containing non digestible cellulose was the predominant form of plants.

Professor Mann also explained that meat is the major source of bioavailable iron and zinc in human diets, and meat and fish are the only source of functional B12 in diets.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Explaining how his own interest in this area developed, Prof Mann said that, “like many nutritionists and dieticians around the world” in the 1980s, he had been trained in the prevailing but “very unscientific and almost Orwellian mantra” of “plant food good, animal food bad” when it came to human nutrition.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Stern-Profile-and-Marked-U.S.-Map
RFK Jr.’s collapsing legacy: U.S. poised to lose measles elimination status
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Colorful GLP-1 Pens with Clocks_tagger
Biohacker influencers are claiming GLP-1 weight loss drugs extend lifespan. One mice experiment suggests there may be some truth to the claim
Teal Hexagon Technology Icons
4 key ways the Blue Wave will upend science policy
Supplement Rain Wellness Illustration
Viewpoint: Bedeviled by “toxic inflammation”? How wellness grifters turn this scientific gray zone into a supplement jackpot
Children’s Health Defense Press Conference
As measles deaths among the unvaccinated hit a 35-year high, Kennedy-founded Children’s Health Defense bizarrely blames doctors for slow-walking a cure
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Confident Doctor in Clinical Setting
More than 80% of ‘pro-science’ candidates were swept into office. Will they have a policy impact?
Screenshot-2026-11-04-at-11.31.42-AM
Uneasy allies: Are MAHA and American agriculture careening toward a breakup?
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.