Does the ‘clean’ food label provide useful information?

Credit: Food Navigator
Credit: Food Navigator

The world of food labels is a confusing one — natural, organic, non-GMO, sugar-free, and clean are just a few. In addition, a laundry list of ingredients on the back of packaged foods may cause a bit of unease about what you are consuming, and rightfully so. In an ideal world, we’d trust the claims on the front of every package, but unfortunately, it’s still the Wild West for manufacturers and their attempts to target consumers. And as the popularity and demand for these healthy labels grow, the umbrella of interpretations they encompass seems to as well, per [International Food Information Service, or] IFIS.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

While the label “clean” means nothing, many brands may use it to signify the product is less processed than typical, but it’s important to remember this is not guaranteed nor regulated. The good news is the demand for a clean label is growing, and the market is forecasted to reach close to $65 billion by 2026. Perhaps this means that in the future, there will be a label to delineate between ultra- and less-processed food, but for now? Clean may as well mean the package was wiped off with a cloth. It offers absolutely no insight into the contents of the food.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-10-19-at-11.09.17-AM
Vaccines, religious freedom, and protecting children’s health: New York Amish appeal to Supreme Court after $118,000 in vaccine fines for blocking shots
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 11.17
Viewpoint: Latest attack on renewable energy and farmers, new USDA rules could put solar grants out of reach for small producers
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
png_cheese_Raw_milk
100% raw milk, 100% misguided: As MAHA-fueled demand for unpasteurized milk soars, American Academy of Pediatrics renews call for a ban on its sale and distribution
Serene Mature Woman in Abstract Waves
Testosterone’s growing appeal to women: It anecdotally mildly improves sex life, but are there any other potential benefits—or red flags?
Golden-GM-Emblem-with-EU-Stars
As Europe inches forward in its embrace of gene-edited crops, hopes abound that opposition to GMOs might fade
Mifeprex Boxes and Woman Drinking Water
RFK Jr.’s EPA capitulates to anti-abortionists, authorizes study of safe abortion pills which activists falsely claim are “poisoning” our water supply
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The ‘shoddy’ Danish couple whose 'research’ inspires RFK, Jr.’s health delusion
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
Nutrition and Supplements Infinity Collage
Drugs and supplements can extend life and five other longevity myths
Screenshot 2026-10-19 at 11.19
How the “wellness” movement has turned into a rigid cultural belief system
sorghum farmers in kenya FARMERS TREND
Here are all the ways CRISPR gene editing is transforming Africa’s staple crops—and there’s a lot more innovation to come
Screenshot-2026-10-20-at-10.53.36-AM
World Health Organization calls Kennedy- and CDC-backed Guinea-Bissau hepatitis B vaccine study designed to ‘prove’ the danger of vaccines “unethical”
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.