Will US consumers ever get to taste gene-edited sirloin? It may depend on whether the FDA or USDA wins broiling regulatory turf war

The USDA said it provides leadership based on the best available science. The FDA said it balances innovation and safety. Credit: Illustratedjc via CC-BY-SA-4.0
The USDA said it provides leadership based on the best available science. The FDA said it balances innovation and safety. Credit: Illustratedjc via CC-BY-SA-4.0

The future ofย genetically modified bacon, steak and fish is at the center of a Washington food fight.

The White House is refereeing whether the Food and Drug Administration or the Agriculture Department should regulate disease-resistant pigs, hornless cattle andย faster-growing salmonโ€”gene edits that could also result in unintended consequences if not done carefully.

Food companies have sought gene-edited cattle and fish because they promise to grow bigger, faster and more resistant to climate change and viruses than current animals. Pork producers and other industry players have been pushing for USDA oversight, saying the agency would be faster and less expensive to deal with than the FDA.

But consumer and environmental groups, worried about safety, counter that the USDA is too close to industry and say the FDA brings the scientific expertise demanded by such a technical area.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The FDA and USDA have been at odds before. The two agencies in 2019 split duties regulating cell-cultured meat. Domestic catfish farmersย got their oversight movedย to USDA in 2016, though that hasnโ€™t worked out as the industry intended, as imports have remained strong while domestic production has dropped.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustleโ€”Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-11.33.46-AM
Anti-seed-oil to anti-vax pipeline: MAHA movement spreads to teen influencers
lab grown meat research kelly schultz lehighuniversity main
Profiles of the 10 top global cultured meat companies
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of โ€œprocessโ€: What science says about the โ€œdangersโ€™ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.