Viewpoint: Organic farming and sustainable agriculture are often in conflict. Here’s why

maxresdefault
Credit: Indian Summer Farm/YouTube
When it comes to denying science, California leads America, and sometimes the world. In early 2020, for example, when the President of the US said to cut travel from China due to SARS-CoV-2, Governor Newsom said he was xenophobic and racist and that since the World Health Organisation denied it was a pandemic, he was opposed to science also.

Credit: Hank Campbell

Prior to that it was a state where we had to hammer the legislature for 10 straight years to eliminate arbitrary exemptions from vaccines, because California schools on the coast had more unvaccinated kids than the rest of the US combined. Prior to that, they tried to ban modern agriculture, along with Happy Meals and Golf.

People ‘east of the 5’, as we say to note the demarcation line from Jenny McCarthy Acolytes to sane people who don’t think Whole Foods produce is grown without pesticides, got most anti-science efforts kicked to the curb at the state level, but one county did ban modern agriculture. In 2004, Mendocino banned GMOs.

Scientifically, it was weird. There is exactly one grape in the world that has not been genetically engineered in the last few hundred years. Everything else produced is a ‘GMO’ the way that anti-science hippies use it. Yet they weirdly even got that wrong.

GMO is a legal term, a specific process, and there are no GMO grapes. By banning GMOs, they were saying that products which don’t exist couldn’t be used, but if a grape was invented using Mutagenesis – literal chemical and radiation baths to force new mutations – it is certified organic.

They knew there were no GMO grapes, their voters were instead so dumb that they believed that if even GMO corn were grown in the county, it would magically transform from corn into grapes and create vineyards full of Frankengrapes. Even Tom Philpott at Mother Jones never wrote anything so stupid in support of organic food, and he really tried.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

None of it made any scientific sense then or now. Molecular biologist Professor Maarten Chrispeels at the University of California San Diego goes into a brief history of how organic industry activists and the journalists at places like Mother Jones who promote alternative ag have deceived the public. They have consistently lied about using no pesticides (they use copper sulfate, which is just older and less effective, requiring far more of it), no genetic engineering (there are thousands of strains created using Mutagenesis and plenty are certified organic) and they lie claiming that they are more “natural” and sustainable.

Farming is not natural and never has been and if you want “sustainable”, using the process with the smallest environmental footprint per calorie, you need modern science – not thanking Gaia while you dump 600% more older pesticides on your plants.

Or you can engage in the same thinking that afflicts the super-majority on the coasts and which NPR lovingly virtue signals toward – that the modern world is killing us and organic food is the only medicine you need.

One thing has changed since Dr. Alex Berezow and I wrote “Science Left Behind” in 2012; Republicans have closed ground on Democrats as anti-vaxxers. But if you think organic food is more natural, healthier, or uses no pesticides, I still know how you vote.

Hank Campbell is the author of Science Left Behind and the founder of Science 2.0. Follow Hank on X @HankCampbell

A version of this article was originally posted at Science 2.0 and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find Science 2.0 on X @science2_0
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-11.33.46-AM
Anti-seed-oil to anti-vax pipeline: MAHA movement spreads to teen influencers

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.