What do Muslim leaders have to say about ethics of germline editing to prevent diseases?

What do Muslim leaders have to say about ethics of germline editing to prevent diseases?
Credit: Midjourney/ Heenan

As Muslims form a significant fraction of the world’s population, understanding Islamic perspectives is crucial for the biomedical industry.

Currently, the overwhelming majority of Islamic scholars agree that genome editing for human enhancement, eg, to amplify traits such as high IQ, athletic prowess, height and complexion is prohibited (haram). This would be tantamount to tampering with God’s creation (Taghyir Khalq Allah), as attested by several fatwas (Islamic religious rulings) issued by reputable Islamic organisations.

Nevertheless, germline genome editing to prevent genetic diseases still elicits some degree of controversy among Islamic scholars.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

To resolve conflicting opinions, it is best to critically examine whether this is aligned with Islamic principles based on Qawaid Fiqhiyyah (Islamic legal maxims) that incorporates Qaṣd (intention), Yaqin (certainty), Ḍarar (injury), Ḍarurah (necessity), and Urf (local customs).

Because germline genome editing of human IVF embryos is not life-saving in itself but intended to save the life or health of a yet unborn future offspring, there is much less necessity and urgency as compared to curing patients who are affected by serious genetic diseases. Hence, it should be ranked lower in priority for public healthcare spending and Government-funded research, based on the Islamic concept of Fiqh al-Awlawiyyat (understanding of priorities).

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
diversity
We are entering a new era of personalized medicine—if you’re white
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
close up arabica coffee farmer s hands picking beans plant his farm colombia
Viewpoint: Why do so many ‘mainstream’ and ‘respected’ media outlets exaggerate climate change threats?
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
kratom
Viewpoint: Kratom ‘supplement’ crisis: DEA sits on its hands while patient addictions to this ineffective drug  rise

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.