Is the public ready to eat bacon from a gene-edited pig? It’s closer than you think

Credit: ISAAA
Credit: ISAAA

Gene-edited pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) could be a commercial reality as soon as 2026 in the U.S., but one expert says it’s unclear how Canada’s regulatory system will respond.

“Based on the science that they’ve used so far to create the gene editing decisions that they’ve made, I would expect that gene editing in a pig should proceed without any additional risk assessments,” said Stuart Smyth, a researcher at the University of Saskatchewan who has specialized in biotechnology regulation.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

…

Currently in Canada, gene-edited plants don’t require additional safety checks if the final plant product doesn’t contain foreign DNA. Similarly, gene editing can’t introduce or increase a known allergen or toxin of key nutritional composition, and it can’t change the food use of the plant.

Smyth said the science that led regulators to that decision could also be applied to animals.

“As long as what’s being put forward doesn’t have any difference in risk profile, it would be difficult to imagine why you would need to have a different regulatory system,” he said.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-02_36_39-PM
Viewpoint: After firing the entire National Science Board, Trump reshapes funding initiatives. Here’s the good and the bad.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-10_36_07-AM
Viewpoint: Even lousy scientific articles can shield authors when they hype dubious health claims and products
sorghum farmers in kenya FARMERS TREND
Here are all the ways CRISPR gene editing is transforming Africa’s staple crops—and there’s a lot more innovation to come
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.