Longevity expert says tinkering with the aging process won’t help you live longer

Credit: UCLA
Credit: UCLA

“We don’t have an ageing intervention yet,” says [Dr Stuart Jay Olshansky]

The only way humans are going to live longer, Olshansky says, is if we discover a way to slow the ageing process. In finding new ways to combat disease, we have simply extended a person’s potential final act.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“In the 20th century, we manufactured an additional 30 years of life, on average, for populations,” he explains. “Back then, life expectancy was close to 50. Today, it’s closer to 80… We need to be enormously grateful for what public health and medicine has given us, because most of us alive today over the age of 60 are living on time that was manufactured for us by medicine and public health.”

[W]e have essentially been playing “a game of whack-a-mole” with fatal diseases, he says. We must address “the ageing of cells, tissues, organs and organ systems that accumulate damage just by living, by breathing, by eating, by oxidising”. He argues – as he always has – that if we don’t find a way to truly slow ageing, then no matter what biohackers might claim (with extreme diets and sleep regimes), human lifespans will plateau.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
kratom
Viewpoint: Kratom ‘supplement’ crisis: DEA sits on its hands while patient addictions to this ineffective drug  rise
using genetics to reverse aging
Is the longevity obsession a new form of ageism?
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 10.25
Science brain drain escalates as Trump purge extends to USDA
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-02_53_56-PM
Embryo gene editing is on the horizon, stirring mixed emotions
Blood blockage
High cholesterol? FDA approves effective oral medication
a-mature-farmer-working-in-the-field-at-sunrise-harvesting-crops-generated-by-ai-photo
What’s the prospect of developing gene-altered crops that are more nutritious and resist climate disruption
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
Screenshot-2026-07-21-at-6.22.06-PM
The Indian physician’s one-woman battle against health disinformation on Wikipedia
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.