Longevity expert says tinkering with the aging process won’t help you live longer

Credit: UCLA
Credit: UCLA

“We don’t have an ageing intervention yet,” says [Dr Stuart Jay Olshansky]

The only way humans are going to live longer, Olshansky says, is if we discover a way to slow the ageing process. In finding new ways to combat disease, we have simply extended a person’s potential final act.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“In the 20th century, we manufactured an additional 30 years of life, on average, for populations,” he explains. “Back then, life expectancy was close to 50. Today, it’s closer to 80… We need to be enormously grateful for what public health and medicine has given us, because most of us alive today over the age of 60 are living on time that was manufactured for us by medicine and public health.”

[W]e have essentially been playing “a game of whack-a-mole” with fatal diseases, he says. We must address “the ageing of cells, tissues, organs and organ systems that accumulate damage just by living, by breathing, by eating, by oxidising”. He argues – as he always has – that if we don’t find a way to truly slow ageing, then no matter what biohackers might claim (with extreme diets and sleep regimes), human lifespans will plateau.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
‘Turbo cancer’ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
Screenshot 2025-11-12 at 3.28
GLP podcast: Evolutionary biologist debunks the 'sex spectrum'
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Gutting the National Science Board: How the Trump-RFK, Jr. crusade is erasing the separation of science and state
Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 11.16
Colossal Bio grows chicks in 3D-printed artificial eggs. Breakthrough or copycat technology?
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 3.28
Vagus nerve wellness grift: How to build a billion dollar business. Are you listening, Kelly Ripa?
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-09_19_32-AM
Viewpoint— “A safe space to chat, flirt, and be intimate without sex”: Are new AI companies exploiting vulnerable asexuals?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.