Neanderthals and humans first mated 50,000 years ago and their DNA may have given us an evolutionary advantage

6bd7ec3f-44fb-4a3c-968e-0a559a234ce9

Far from triumphantly breezing out of Africa, modern humans went extinct many times before going on to populate the world, new studies have revealed.

The new DNA research has also shed new light on the role our Neanderthal cousins played in our success.

While these early European humans were long seen as a species which we successfully dominated after leaving Africa, new studies show that only humans who interbred with Neanderthals went on to thrive, while other bloodlines died out.

In fact, Neanderthal genes may have been crucial to our success by protecting us from new diseases we hadn’t previously encountered.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

A separate DNA study, published in the journal Science, shows that modern humans held on to some key genetic traits from Neanderthals that may have given them an evolutionary advantage.

One relates to their immune system. When humans emerged from Africa, they were extremely susceptible to new diseases they had never encountered. Interbreeding with Neanderthals gave their offspring protection.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-2.36.47-PM
Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-11.13.59-AM
RFK Jr.’s plan to curb America’s appetite for ultra-processed foods and artificial dyes blocked by the White House
Screenshot-2026-10-07-at-10.15.18-AM
Hooked on kratom: The unregulated, natural, alcohol-free “social tonic” that is destroying lives 
Radioactive-Americana-Collage-2
The kooky logic behind the raft of spurious cancer claims from Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-11.26.17-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness movement activists reposition nicotine from a killer addictive drug into a cure-all for brain ills
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
Resolute-Portrait-with-Injured-Teddy-Bear
Anti-vax Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton alleges conspiracy by doctors, drugmakers, and insurers to push childhood vaccination for profit
Supreme-Court-Amid-Climate-Crisis
Should fossil fuel companies be shielded from lawsuits over climate change damage? The Supreme Court takes up the question
Childrens-Health-Defense-Press-Briefing
Court links patient’s death to anti-vaccine doctor promoted by Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense
strand of dna genetics
No, GMO foods do not “damage genes, natural disposition and hormones, or decrease physical health and intelligence”
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.