Viewpoint: With indiscriminate cuts to food programs, the U.S., not nature, is destabilizing global agriculture

Screenshot 2026-01-19 at 1.16.25โ€ฏPM

[L]ately, the United States, not nature, has created the biggest uncertainty for global agriculture.

Until last year, when the Trump administration dismantled it, the U.S. Agency for International Development [USAID] had been a major supporter of global agricultural science, disbursing about $150 million a year to universities, companies and international research centers. That funding was part of the Feed the Future initiative, which was most recently reauthorized in 2023, with broad bipartisan support.ย Now, around the world, scientists are scuttling or scaling back studies meant to defend the worldโ€™s food supply ….

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

About a third of Feed the Futureโ€™s agricultural science budget went toย 17 labs at U.S. universitiesย that study everything from aquaculture and cereals to fruits and tubers. All but one of the labsย received stop-work orders early last yearย when the Trump administration froze development spending and laterย eliminated it.

Vern Long, who directed U.S.A.I.D.โ€™s agricultural research team from 2017 to 2019, said the need to address threats to the global breadbasket was bigger than partisan politics. โ€œThese issues transcend national identity,โ€ she said. โ€œThese issues are about humanity.โ€

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?
Screenshot-2026-06-02-at-11.59.11-AM
Magnifica Humanitas: Popeโ€™s encyclical broadside against AI naivete and overreach
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpointโ€”GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choiceโ€”without offering any health benefits
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-11_39_58-AM
Viewpoint: Who is RFK, Jr.โ€™s newly-appointed CDC senior counselor, Sara Brenner โ€” Vaccine skeptic and self-proclaimed โ€œMAHA momโ€
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
โ€˜Turbo cancerโ€™ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.