How to “vaccinate” against mis- and disinformation

As part of BBC Media Action’s broader effort to understand what works in tackling information disorder, we’re testing proactive responses to mis- and disinformation in places where such interventions are rarely studied. 

…

Much like a medical vaccine builds resistance to disease, the [inoculation] theory suggests that exposing people to a weakened version of a manipulative technique and showing them how to refute it can build resilience against future exposure. This is the basis of the prebunking approach: helping audiences understand common manipulation techniques, like emotional language, false dichotomies, personal attack, and scapegoating, before they encounter them in the wild.

In partnership with the [United Nations Development Programme], we produced two videos and carried out two randomised control trials via our local El Kul (For Everyone) current affairs platform – a trusted source of information with over a million weekly users.

Related on the SLP

Challenging Kennedy—MAHA skepticism disinformation: No, the vaccine schedule is not a haphazard, scientific mess Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s ‘useful idiots’: His 6-point plan that undermines U.S. health policy rolls along

Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’

Patches for sleep, weight, NAD+, energy, focus, periods. No evidence to support the latest social media wellness scams

Jump-starting global warming: Rising temperatures are driving up emissions from wildfires, fermenting wetlands, and melting permafrost

[T]he results were encouraging. We found:  

• Improved sharing discernment for scapegoating content ….
• Improved technique recognition for emotionally manipulative language ….

We shared these insights at the 2025 Cambridge Disinformation Summit contributing to a wider conversation on what it takes to tackle information disorder in lower-trust, lower-resource contexts.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here