African science innovation is growing exponentially, but it’s almost entirely absent from Wikipedia. Why that’s a problem.

Africa’s scientific output is surging, but you’d barely know it from Wikipedia: the continent accounts for roughly 10 percent of the site’s articles, yet science and technology topics make up less than 1 percent, as Duncan Mboya reports for SciDev.Net.

A two-percent problem

The gap traces back to who’s writing. Just 2 percent of Wikipedia’s editors are African, despite the platform logging 50 billion monthly contributions, said Anusha Alikhan, chief communications officer at the Wikimedia Foundation.

Cameroonian engineer Eugene Agbor Egbe, named Wikipedia’s 2025 Technology Contributor of the Year after training over 1,000 engineers across five countries, put it starkly: “We must become contributors, otherwise the next generation will find us absent.” Left undocumented, he warned, “Africa will not only be invisible but also dependent on narratives shaped elsewhere.”

Job Mwaura, a research associate at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, blames thin government and university research funding across most of the continent, with South Africa a rare exception.

Related on the SLP

Wikipedia has assembled an informative list of fake news websites from across the ideological spectrum The Indian physician’s one-woman battle against health disinformation on Wikipedia

Combating ‘narrative distortion’: Will pharma companies step up to challenge health misinformation?

At anti-vaccine MAHA conference, RFK Jr. pledges to unify federal health information and combat vaccine safety ‘misinformation’

Non-browning CRISPR gene-edited bananas move one step closer to British markets

The stakes outlast the encyclopedia itself: AI models trained on Wikipedia’s text risk baking that same erasure into whatever comes next.

Related on the SLP African genes are not well represented in research databases. Here’s why that’s a problem

Read the original article here