Human embryo research restrictions: Scientists move to drop 14-day limit on research

Credit: EPA/Seoul University/AAP
Credit: EPA/Seoul University/AAP

For the last 40 years, the rule, which is law in some countries and a guideline in others, has served as an important stop sign for embryonic research. It has provided a clear signal to the public that scientists wouldn’t grow babies in labs. To researchers, it gave clarity about what research they could pursue.

Now, however, a key scientific body is ready to do away with the 14-day limit. The action would come at a time when scientists are making remarkable progress in growing embryonic cells and watching them develop. 

…

By allowing both normal and artificial embryos to continue developing after two weeks, the end of the self-imposed limit could unleash impressive but ethically charged new experiments on extending human development outside the womb.

The International Society for Stem Cell Research has prepared draft recommendations to move such research out of a category of “prohibited” scientific activities and into a class of research that can be permitted after ethics review and depending on national regulations.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

People familiar with ISSCR processes say there is not unanimous support for withdrawing the 14-day rule, with objections coming from bioethicists and some scientists. But they are in the minority: most agree that it needs to be eased.

Read the original post

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
newborn baby spit up gerd
Vaccine-preventable congenital infections are a leading driver of autism
Screenshot-2026-10-14-at-11.45.36-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s stacked FDA advisory council endorses multicancer screening test from ethically- questionable company that would increase false positives and waste billions of dollars
Misinformation-Shatters-the-Clockwork-Mind
Viewpoint: The price Americans pay for science denialism
Screenshot-2026-10-15-at-12.13.33-PM
Ahead of the midterms, Meta has paid at least 29 anti-LGBTQ accounts for their posts
Screenshot-2026-10-14-at-12.47.21-PM
Viewpoint: Are these Trump-conservative GOP doctor-politicians violating their medical oath?
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-10.41.33-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness patches: Most vitamin supplements are useless and sometimes even dangerous, but this craze is even worse
Crossed-Out-Calendar-with-Milk-Carton
Viewpoint: The shocking consequences after a year of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s distortions, deceptions, and flat-out falsehoods
Pride and Patriotism in the Breeze
Retreat from identity labels: Does the sharply declining number of young teens identifying as gay and bisexual reflect an ideological shift?
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
Screenshot-2026-10-07-at-1.03.15-PM
Anti-vaxxers’ double whammy: Exaggerated vaccine fears have fueled measles outbreaks and preventable deaths—and left survivors more vulnerable to other infections for years
Cross and Syringe Standoff
Viewpoint: Hijacking Jesus: How anti-vaccine fanatics are exploiting religious exemptions and killing children
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.