Viewpoint: A plastic surgeon on why banning gender-transition surgery without further research is wrong and harmful

Gemini_Generated_Image_gabo48gabo48gabo

In [February, 2026], [The American Society of Plastic Surgeons] ASPS, a society for which I previously served on the Board of Directors, issued a “Position Statement on Gender Surgery for Children and Adolescents,” which argued against providing gender-affirming surgical care to anyone under the age of 19. The statement helped support the Trump administration’s continuing fight against gender-affirming care for adults and teenagers.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Using strategic language like “weak evidence” is how anti-trans groups have effectively misled a general audience. Low-quality evidence is different from saying that treatment is harmful….When low-quality studies demonstrate positive outcomes, the next step is to generate higher levels evidence, not ban care. Anti-trans advocates frequently cite the Cass Review anticipating that you won’t read the study. But the conclusion of the study calls for more research, not a ban on care.

Let me be clear: We need more data to figure out the best way to care for adolescents with gender dysphoria. Patients get the best outcomes with skilled providers, multidisciplinary teams, and funded research focused on quality improvement.


This is an excerpt. Read the original post here



{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-8-2026-12_32_48-PM
Viewpoint: SCOTUS strikes a blow against junk science in Bayer glyphosate case. Will it deter mass tort litigators?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-07-08-at-9.36.03-AM
Viewpoint: Long-contained diseases are on the rise in the U.S. Are Trump cuts to blame?
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
c9f0a584-46e9-4dd8-9a77-f5f5a7a51a84
Across Eastern Europe, science disinformation has spread far beyond COVID and vaccine denialism. Here’s the grim list.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-7-2026-01_57_55-PM
Viewpoint: Europe’s rejection of air conditioning is the poster child for misunderstanding how to mitigate the impact of climate change
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-12_37_08-PM
Viewpoint: Trump poised to politicize all U.S.-supported science research
Viewpoint: Consensus as truth? How ‘misinformation police’ control policy narratives
Which among war, weather and cyber attacks is the biggest world threat? None of the above. It’s misinformation, and here’s why.
Screenshot 2026-07-11 100209
Viewpoint: Supplements to clean your liver? Not a good idea.
Screenshot-2026-07-10-at-3.10.50-PM
Snake-oil cures throughout history
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.