‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used

screenshot at  am

The European Chemicals Agency’s Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) has reaffirmed, for the third time in nine years, that glyphosate does not warrant a carcinogen classification, even after reviewing new tumor data, as Food Safety Magazine’s Bailee Henderson reports. The September 8, 2026 decision upholds RAC’s 2022 hazard assessment and a 2023 EU risk review that found no critical health concerns tied to the world’s most widely used herbicide.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The committee weighed fresh findings from the Ramazzini Institute’s 2025 Global Glyphosate Study, which dosed thousands of rats with glyphosate in utero and over 104 weeks of life, reporting significant increases in several tumor types, including leukemia, at or below the EU’s official safety thresholds. Even so, RAC concluded the study “does not change the conclusions of glyphosate’s hazard assessment, in particular its former 2022 decision that the substance does not warrant a classification for carcinogenicity.”

The lone holdout remains the World Health Organization’s cancer research arm, which labeled glyphosate a “probable carcinogen” in 2015 using a hazard-based method critics say ignores real-world exposure. Every agency that has weighed the actual evidence since — ECHA three times over, plus EFSA and roughly 20 other regulators worldwide — has reached the same verdict: glyphosate is safe as used.

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.