Hands-off: Trump rejects calls by AI leaders to increase regulation and slow development, citing Chinese competition

President Donald Trump on September 13, 2026, brushed off calls from three top AI leaders — Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and xAI’s Elon Musk — to slow the pace of AI development, insisting the US can’t afford to cede ground to China, as The Washington Post’s Cat Zakrzewski reports.

Speaking on the sidelines of the Irish Open golf tournament in Dublin, Trump said: “We’re leading China in AI, we’re the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way. Whoever wins AI wins.” He dismissed the executives’ concerns — which followed a high-profile Anthropic researcher’s resignation over safety worries — as coming from “negative forces” pushing “things that won’t happen.”

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The remarks expose a widening rift among Trump’s allies. Rep. Ted Lieu called the executives’ caution “a direct result of the Trump administration letting the AI industry run wild,” warning “November is coming.” David Sacks, architect of the administration’s hands-off AI policy, told companies to “go ahead” and slow down but to “stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission” — rejecting Amodei’s push for antitrust waivers so rivals can coordinate on safety.

Microchips and U.S.-China AI competition
Related on the SLP
Viewpoint: Trump’s relaxed controls on supplying China with microchips could undermine U.S. AI dominance

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-14-at-11.45.36-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s stacked FDA advisory council endorses multicancer screening test from ethically- questionable company that would increase false positives and waste billions of dollars
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-10.41.33-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness patches: Most vitamin supplements are useless and sometimes even dangerous, but this craze is even worse
newborn baby spit up gerd
Vaccine-preventable congenital infections are a leading driver of autism
Screenshot-2026-10-15-at-12.13.33-PM
Ahead of the midterms, Meta has paid at least 29 anti-LGBTQ accounts for their posts
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.