Idaho farmers divided on GMO labeling

Some Idaho farmers would like the Legislature to pass a bill to forestall a statewide initiative that would require labeling of all genetically modified foods.

Initiatives to require labeling of genetically modified organisms – GMOs – have died in Washington, Oregon and Colorado in part due to multimillion-dollar ad campaigns by the food industry.

Americans always like transparency, but when they learn just how widespread GMOs already are in our diets, voters have been receptive to the industry’s arguments that labeling just adds costs without meaningful benefit.

Most of the corn and soybeans spread throughout the foods we eat comes from genetically modified seeds. Agribusiness has expanded this technology overwhelmingly since the 1980s.

But Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Bert Brackett said he doesn’t think a bill that prevents labeling will go anywhere this legislative session, because farmers themselves are divided.

The fact is, most people know little or nothing about GMOs. The Boise City Club and the Idaho Environmental Forum hosted a good discussion Thursday featuring two of the key Idaho voices in the debate. On one side was Trent Clark, public affairs director in Soda Springs for Monsanto, the large agribusiness that is one of the nation’s leading advocates of genetically modified crops. On the other side was Jenny Easley, of Middleton, co-founder and president of the nonprofit GMO Free Idaho.

Read full, original article:ย Rocky Barker: Idaho farmers divided over GMO labeling

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: โ€œTurn on, tune in, drop outโ€โ€”Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.