Is there still hope for coral reefs damaged by human activity?

Humans bear much of the responsibility for the steady decimation of coral reefs. The marine ecosystems have been overfished, dissolved by their increasingly acidic surroundings and cooked in the warming waters of the worldโ€™s oceans. Roughly 20 percent of coral reefs have already collapsed beyond recovery, and half of those that remain are poised to follow. With billions of dollars in ecosystem services and tourism revenue at stake, protecting reefs has become a top priority around the globe, but little research has been done to find out how long it will take these ecosystems to recover.

Researchers report in the journal Nature that protected reefs could bounce back in as little as 35 years on average, but that the most heavily degraded reefs may take as many as 59 years to fully recover.

To settle on these timelines, the researchers looked at data from 832 coral reefs spanning 64 countries and territories around the world. They used the population density of reef fish around relatively untouched reefs to estimate the global baseline density of reef biomass and compared that baseline to marine protected reefs where fishing had been banned to get the rate of recovery.

Luckily, MacNeil and his colleagues found that even partial fishing restrictions could help save endangered reefs. The study showed that reefs with at least some form of fishing restrictionsโ€”such as bans on specific gear or limits on which types of fish can be caughtโ€”had 27 percent more biomass recovery than reefs without any restrictions at all. Thatโ€™s good news for countries that canโ€™t afford to enforce total restrictions.

Read full original article: A Long Road to Recovery for Coral Reefs

 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzengaโ€™s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-10.19.30-AM
โ€˜Naturalโ€™ wellness supplements linked to liver injury
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and whatโ€™s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The โ€˜shoddyโ€™ Danish couple whose 'researchโ€™ inspires RFK, Jr.โ€™s health delusion
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-03_24_05-PM
Misinformed parents overdosing children with Vitamin A to fight measles
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-11_54_59-AM
Why weight-loss drugs might be reducing cancer rates and making treatment more effective
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-12_30_14-PM
The โ€˜low-qualityโ€™, retracted studies RFK, Jr. and MAHA rely on for anti-vaccine claims
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.