Genes may be responsible for your insatiable sweet tooth

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

Ever find yourself fantasizing about decadent sweets on the last few miles of your run? Some of us can’t wait to get our hands on a caramel ice cream brownie sundae!

But some of my runner friends find their teeth aching at the mere thought of an indulgence as sweet as that. Countless people also avoid treats believing that eating them causes your body to crave more sugary foods. However, a recent study proposes that your genes might be responsible for your perception of sweet.

The researchers selected a sample of 1,901 adolescents and young adults between the ages of 12 and 26 years. The sample included 243 pairs of identical twins, 452 pairs of fraternal twins, and 511 unpaired individuals. The researchers asked the participants to taste and rate the sweetness intensity of four sweeteners: glucose, fructose, aspartame, and neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (NHDC)

The study found a common genetic factor appeared to be responsible for more than 75 percent of the genetic variance in the four sweeteners. This suggests the differences in perceived sweet intensity are due to a single set of genes. The variation in sweet perception may lead those born with a weak sweet perception to sprinkle more sugar on their strawberries to achieve the same level of sweetness as others.

Read full, original post: Have a Sweet Tooth? Maybe Blame Your Genes

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-3.07.42-PM
Controversy over WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s comment opposing trans females in women’s sports reinvigorates the culture wars
Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-2.30.35-PM
Climate scientists claim conservative activists are promoting ‘lies’ that Europe’s summer heatwaves are far from unusual
Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 05_50_04 PM
Fear, science, and the law: If talc powder is unlikely to cause cancer and J&J was winning in court, why did it pay more than $5.5 billion to settle?
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 06_26_01 PM 2
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food myths make a comeback on Instagram, with Dr. Kevin Folta
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 12_05_21 PM
AI-generated physicians promoting bogus cures and worthless supplements surge on social media
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 10_14_27 PM
After muzzling RFK, Jr. over autism-vaccine conspiracy theories, Trump defies aides to push scares again
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 1.38
Viewpoint: Are the U.S. and Europe headed towards a repudiation of agricultural biotechnology red tape?
Screenshot 2026-07-29 at 1.03
Two food fads that have some merit: Chia seeds in almost everything and protein added to water
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.