The ‘Big O’: How and why evolution brought us the female orgasm

big o
The female orgasm is perplexing. Itโ€™s not necessary to get pregnant. Penis-in-vagina sex is not the best way to generate one, although thatโ€™s still the most efficient wayย to make a baby. And when thinking in human evolution terms, it seems hard to find a compelling reason why humans need have one at all.

A study in the Journal of Experimental Zoology takes a look at the female orgasm by comparing not just to the male orgasm but also to the hormonal and physiological changes in females of other species. Evolutionary biologists Mihaela Pavlicev and Gunter Wagner say there is reason to believe that female orgasms used to be necessary because it induced ovulation in our pre-human ancestors.

Humans and other primates are cyclic ovulators. Hormonal cycles drive ovulation on a regular schedule, depending on health, nutrition and environment. But many other mammal species are induced ovulators. Females in these species are signaled to release an egg by having sex. It seems likely based on our knowledge of evolution that our common ancestors were also induced ovulators. So, at one time in human history โ€™orgasmโ€™โ€”or rather the hormone flood that induces ovulationโ€”was absolutely necessary to reproduce.

big o 5 10 18 2

The authors also looked at genital morphology across species, from induced ovulators to humans and other primates. Interestingly, as we move from induced ovulator species to spontaneous ovulators the clitoris seems to move too. The clitorises of rabbits for example are located in the reproductive canal. They are directly stimulated in matingย which triggers theย release of a hormone flood that induces ovulation. Carl Zimmer writes:

Many female mammals release oxytocin and prolactin during sexโ€”the hormones released by women during orgasms. Whatโ€™s more, in many of those species, females use a radically different kind of reproduction. While women release an egg each month, other female mammals, such as rabbits and camels, release an egg only after mating with a male. Ovulatory cycles evolved in only a few lineages of mammals, including our own, Dr. Pavlicev and Dr. Wagner found. Before then, our ancient mammal ancestors originally relied on ovulation triggered by sex with a male.

In humans, there is great variation in clitoris size and location, but the organ steadfastly remains outside of the vaginal canal. This is part of the reason why many women report difficulty in having orgasms from intercourse unless there is additional clitoris-specific stimulation.

Holly Dunsworth, an evolutionary anthropologist at the University of Rhode Island who was not involved in the study, praised the paperโ€™s focus on anatomy and physiology rather than humanโ€™s social relationships.

โ€œItโ€™s refreshing to see someone look at the physiology rather than continue to hypothesize about orgasmโ€™s role in mate value,โ€ she said.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

There are a couple of caveats to the study. Pleasure is not restricted just to the moment of orgasm in either male or females. Itโ€™s unclear if the induced ovulators are feeling euphoria during mating like that associated with primate orgasms. Female orgasm in induced ovulators is a hot, but under funded area of veterinary research. So while we know the hormone rush in induced ovulators and orgasms are similar, itโ€™s difficult to say they are exactly the same.

Another interesting question is if men can ejaculate without orgasm which would be evidence of the separation between pleasure and reproduction in males as it is in females. In the current medical literature, the phenomenonย is quite rare. There are documented cases of men with this experience but it is usually tied to either depression or as a side effect fromย treatment of depression with anti-depressants. The most compelling follow up question, and hopefully one that draws further research, is how and why spontaneous ovulation evolved in the first place.

Many commentaries on Pavlicev and Wagnerโ€™s study compare the female orgasm to the male nipple. Although extraneous, they continue to exist to perpetuate their counterparts in the other sex where they are vital for reproduction and breastfeeding respectively. Shanoor Seervai writes at STAT:

It may have lost its biological function, but the female orgasm is here to stay. Thatโ€™s because the clitoris and the penis develop from the same part of the embryo. โ€œIf the clitoris went away through evolution, so may the penis,โ€ said Wagner. No penis means no way for sperm to naturally enter a womanโ€™s body, so unless we reproduce via medical procedures like in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination, this could threaten the survival of the human race.

But that may also be a stretch. Although a female orgasm is not necessary for pregnancy, women do care if theyโ€™re having them. And they may be using them as a signal for mate choice. After all, if your mate is conscientious enough to care you have an orgasm, he might also be conscientious enough to make sure you and your mutual offspring have enough food to survive.

Meredith Knight is a contributor to the Genetic Literacy Project and a science and health writer in Austin, Texas. Follow her on Twitter @meremereknight.

A version of this story was originally published at the GLP in August 2016.

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: โ€œTurn on, tune in, drop outโ€โ€”Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT Image Jun 1, 2026, 11_39_17 AM
Viewpoint: When food myths go viral, farmers pay the price
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.