Michael Pollan: Foodie journalist promotes organics, scorns mainstream farming

Updated January 1, 2019 |
michael pollan highres

Name
Center for Food Safety
Founded
1999
Location (primary)
Washington, DC USA
TYPE
NGO
STATUS
US 501C3, 501C4
Founder(s)
Andrew Kimbrell
Website
www.centerforfoodsafety.com

Michael Pollan is a journalist and advocate of organic and mostly vegetarian diets for health, environmental, and socio-economic reasons and is a sharp critic of what he calls “industrial agriculture,” including the use of genetically modified crops.ย He is seen as an important intellectual leader of the pro-organic food movement.

He was featured in a PBS special In Defense of Food that aired on December 29th 2015. In it, Pollan discussed the damages he believes are being done to Americanย health by the industrial western diet. Pollan will also star in a fourย episode docu-series on Netflix, titled Cooked,ย which will focus on many of Pollan’s long heldย anti-modernization ideals. The series is set to debut February 19th, 2016.

He is the author of several best sellers, most notablyย the 2006’sย The Omnivore’s Dilemma, which the New York Timesย named on of the best 5 books of the year, and 2008’sIn Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto.ย Pollan has also appeared on screen in aย co-starring role in the 2008 Academy Award nominee documentary Food, Inc.ย The film and his books explore the industrialization and corporatizing of agriculture and food production through examining practices related to both livestock and crops.

Pollan is often asked to act as an analystย on food issues, including crop biotechnology but heย saysย different things to different audiences, appearing to cautiously endorse the safety of GMOs to one, but when talking to journalists or public audiences that are openly hostile to GMOs, he is far more critical of biotechnology.

In a 2013 interview withย Grist’s food editor,ย Nathanael Johnson, Pollanย projected a moderate tone on GMOs, “Iโ€™m a skeptic, and Iโ€™m critical of the way the technology [GMOs] has been developed and deployed and what itโ€™s done to American agriculture, but I donโ€™t think the technology itself is intrinsically evil.”ย Later that year he reiterated this beliefย toย NPR, stating, โ€œI havenโ€™t seen any evidence thatโ€™s persuaded me that thereโ€™s any danger to health [from GMOs].โ€

Yet his response to similar questioning variesย substantially when speaking to an “organic-friendly” audience. During anย interview withย John Robbinsโ€”ย anย anti-biotech campaignerโ€”Pollan revealed that heย wrote anti-GMO food articles for the New York Times without any required balance from his editors:

“The media has really been on our side for the most part. I know this from writing for the New York Times where Ive written about a lot of other topics, but when I wrote about food I never had to give equal time to the other side. I could say whatever I thought and offer my own conclusions. Say you should buy grass feed beef and organic is better, and these editors in New York didn’t realize there is anyone who disagrees with that point of view. So I felt like I got a free ride for a long time.”[1]

Full video of Pollan-Robbins interview

Career

Michael Pollan was born in 1955 and grew up on Long Island, New York. He is the son of author, lawyer and “high-priced” financial consultant Stephen Michael Pollanย and gourmet and New York Magazine columnist Corrine Elaine Staller “Corky” Pollan. One of hisย sisters is actress Tracy Pollan, who is married to actor Michael J. Fox. Pollan has two other sisters Lori and Dana. Pollanย lives in the Bay Area with his wife, the painter Judith Belzer, and their one son.

Pollan received a bachelor’s degree in english from Bennington College in Bennington, Vermont and a master’s degree in english from Columbia University in New York City.ย Pollan on several occasions, including during the opening of his PBS special and the interview with John Robbins, has described that his lack of education in the sciences is actually a benefit for him when discussing and writing on issues like food and nutrition..

In 2003, Pollan was appointed the John S. and James L. Knight Professor of Journalism at University of California Berkeleyโ€™s Graduate School of Journalism, and the director of the Knight Program in Science and Environmental Journalism. In addition to teaching, he lectures widely on food, agriculture, health and the environment.

In 2009 he was named by Newsweek as one of the top 10 โ€œNew Thought Leaders.โ€ and inย 2010 was named toย TIME 100, the magazineโ€™s annual list of the worldโ€™s 100 most influential people.

Social media

Outside of print and film, muchย of Pollan’s advocacy work has been through social media. He has received a high degree of criticism for promoting on Twitter discredited studies or studies that have appearedย in non-reputable journals. On Twitter, Pollan has (as of January 2016) almost half-a-million followers. In 2012, Pollan showed support on Twitter for a highly criticized study, including by some anti-GMO activists, done by Giles-Eric Sรฉralini a Frenchย scientist who has produced several highly criticized papers on biotechnology. The study was later retracted.

pollan-2

He has also supported the opinions of an organization known as the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER), which isย an openly anti-GMO organization founded by Sรฉralini and other campaigning scientists. When they, in 2013,ย issued a statement claimingย that the scientific consensus on GMOs does not exist, Pollan tweeted to help spread their message:

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.20.05 PM

Pollan was also one of the first anti-GMO activists, along with other โ€˜reputableโ€™ media sources like NaturalNews.comย to promote the notorious findings by Australian researcher Judy Carman that alleged, in contradiction to numerous mainstream studies, that GMO corn caused irritation in pigsโ€”claims since dismembered by a slew of scientistsย and journalists.

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.35.34 PM

Almost weekly, Pollan can be found hawking one anti-GMO study or alarmist NGO claim on Twitter.

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.33.20 PM

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.34.34 PM

His large number of followers and his commitment to supporting organic food on Twitter have made him a vital messenger and defenderย of organic food industry funded science. The extent of his involvement with the organic food industry was revealed in emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act Request by the New York Timesย ofย former Washington State University researcher Chuck Benbrook. While he was at Washington State University, Benbrook was being funded exclusively by the organic food industry.ย Benbrook’s emails detailed how the organic food industry relied onย a long list of seemingly independent journalists to promote and defend Benbrook’s work in both print and on social media. In response to a Stanford University study that found no nutritional benefit to organic food over conventional, Pollan endorsed Benbrook’s minority opinion on the study:

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.20.51 PM

The Benbrook emails describe a long list of organic-friendly journalists and personalities and Pollan’s name is not only on this list, heย receives special mention as a member of the industry’s “A-team.” The documents describe the A Team:

Screen Shot 2016-01-20 at 1.37.03 PM

The FOIA documents showed that these interactions go beyond industry or science leaders pitching the occasional story to a journalist. The emails also revealย him as a key media consultant for industry leaders like Davidย Bronner (of Dr. Bronner’s soaps). These are the types of industry over-reach that Pollan has criticized throughout his career.

Criticisms

  • Good Science Isn’t Bad for Our Diet: A Critique of Michael Pollan’s Food Politics,ย Adam Merberg in Berkeley Science Review 2012: “Regrettably, though, as in The Omnivoreโ€™s Dilemma, Pollan presents an overstated case against science, and the result is an argument layered with contradiction and distortion.”
  • Why Leading Foodies Tolerate Junk Science,ย Keith Kloor in Discover Magazine November 8th, 2012:ย “So yes, while politics (โ€œwho should control the food systemโ€) is an underlying basis for much anti-GMO sentiment, thereโ€™s also no getting around that fear of genetically modified crops is a big factor, too. And that fear is a palpable force driving the anti-GMO ranks within the food movement, which Pollan et al cynically exploit to advance a political agenda that aims to change the way food is produced and curb the power of agricultural giants like Monsanto.”
  • Michael Pollan as GMO โ€˜denialistโ€™ dupes credulous New York Times,ย Jon Entine on Forbes October 22, 2013: “The reality is that Pollan regularly, and increasingly, talks out of both sides of his mouth โ€” there, I wrote it โ€” and because of his influence he is inflaming a discussion about crop biotechnology that has already gone off the rails.”
  • The Omnivoreโ€™s Delusion: Against the Agri-intellectuals,ย Blake Hurst in a publication for the American Enterprise Institute titledย The Omnivoreโ€™s Delusion: Against the Agri-intellectualsย July 30th, 2009: “Pollan writes as if all of his ideas are new, but my father tells of agriculture extension meetings in the late 1950s entitled ‘Clover and Corn, the Road to Profitability.’ Farmers know that organic farming was the default position of agriculture for thousands of years, years when hunger was just around the corner for even advanced societies.”

 

Bibliography & Resources

References

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.