DNA blueprint for fetus built using tests of parents

parent DNA

For the first time, researchers at the University of Washington have determined almost the complete genome of a fetus, using only a blood sample from the mother and a saliva sample from the father. This accomplishment will make it easier for parents to know the DNA blueprint of their child months because it is born, and without any invasive tactics. However, this new discovery also promises to raise some controversy- will the ability to know so many traits about an unborn child lead to more abortions based on the parents’ preferences?

“There are some scenarios that are extremely troubling,” said Marcy Darnovsky, associate executive director of the Center for Genetics and society, a public interest group in Berkeley, California. Darnovsky fears that the cutting-edge technology will raise questions on who “deserves to be born.”

Bioethical implications are emerging with the new technology. Some critics have suggested that the test should not be used to test for abnormalities including schizophrenia, autism and intellectual impairments, due to the suggestion that these may influence parents to abort the fetus. Critics expound on this fear by worrying that parents may even use the test to create an “ideal” child- with a certain desired hair color, eye color and disposition.

Despite the looming ethical issues the new test may raise, it is no doubt a huge achievement in the field of genetics. “It’s an extraordinary of technology, really quite remarkable,” said Peter Benn, professor of genetics and developmental biology at the University of Connecticut.

The process of performing the test as of now is not practical or affordable. The test itself is also not accurate for use now. But the new discovery does pave the way for a better understanding of prenatal genetics, and keeps us asking- what’s next?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-3-2026-01_17_14-PM
MAHA wellness influencers deride proven anxiety medications, tout lifestyle fixes
ChatGPT Image Apr 30, 2026, 01_11_41 PM
Trump’s America First health aid cuts: Retrenchment has already hit global malaria, HIV, TB, and polio programs
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-03_16_32-PM
Viewpoint: How ‘health care guru’ Joe Rogan circumvented the FDA’s skepticism on psychedelics
Drinking lots of water can help reduce the effects of aging
Nanoplastics in drinking water: MAHA activists forge science-based bipartisan coalition 
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.