Misrepresentations dogged both sides of Prop 37 campaign

GMPlantsMain x
The Yes on 37 campaign argued that it lost due to “lies, dirty tricks, and $45 million” spent by the “No” supporters, pinning its defeat almost entirely on being outspent by industry using “propaganda and dirty tricks.” But a more dispassionate analysis finds exaggerations abounded on both sides of the campaign. He offers an alternative view on the reasons why Proposition 37 failed, and make some suggestions that labeling proponents might want to take to heart.
 
Related Articles: 

View the original article here: Why Did Proposition 37 Fail?

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: What are mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and how do they work?

Infographic: What are mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and how do they work?

As of 1 December 2020, thirteen vaccines have reached the final stage of testing: where they are being given to ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend