Misrepresentations dogged both sides of Prop 37 campaign

GMPlantsMain x
The Yes on 37 campaign argued that it lost due to “lies, dirty tricks, and $45 million” spent by the “No” supporters, pinning its defeat almost entirely on being outspent by industry using “propaganda and dirty tricks.” But a more dispassionate analysis finds exaggerations abounded on both sides of the campaign. He offers an alternative view on the reasons why Proposition 37 failed, and make some suggestions that labeling proponents might want to take to heart.
 
Related Articles: 

View the original article here: Why Did Proposition 37 Fail?

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

More than 2.8 million people have lost their lives due to the pandemic, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis ...
seralinistud

Gilles-Éric Séralini: Activist professor and face of anti-GMO industry

The French biologist and his research team--funded by the Rodale ...
vandana shiva

Vandana Shiva: ‘Rock Star’ of GMO protest movement has anti-science history

In a 2012 interview, Bill Moyers referred to Vandana Shiva as ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend