Your genes influence your political views. So what?

A small but active cottage industry has sprung up to explore the genetic bases of political attitudes and behavior. Studies of “genopolitics,” as the field has come to be called, are much more likely than conventional political science to turn up in Science or The New York Times Magazine. After all, unlike much of what we do, they look like real science, especially from a distance. But what will work of this sort really add to our understanding of politics? My own guess is, not much.

My argument is not that genetic explanations of political attitudes and behavior are infeasible (though they are sure to be extremely difficult to achieve) or illegitimate (though it is easy to imagine them being harnessed to unsavory political ends). It is simply that the real scientific payoff does not look worth the effort.

Read the full, original story here: Your genes influence your political views. So what?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 1.38
Viewpoint: Are the U.S. and Europe headed towards a repudiation of agricultural biotechnology red tape?
Screenshot-2026-07-27-at-3.23.14-PM
Prioritizing AI, robotics, and nuclear energy: Trump administration is guiding research funding away from independent universities to private companies
png-terrace-Farm-asia
Europe’s tentative embrace of agricultural gene editing could revolutionize food production and health in Asia
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-11_51_01-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s depressingly misguided (and litigator-funded) crusade against antidepressants
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_35_53-PM
FDA takes up peptide therapies as hype outpaces science
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_58_17-PM
Louisiana and Texas bring RFK,Jr.- MAHA-backed restrictions on dyes and other ‘controversial’ ingredients to eight states
Screenshot 2026-07-27 at 6.15
No test, no tennis: Women’s Tennis Association becomes first major female sports league to require genetic sex testing
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-09_42_12-AM-1
Peptides, patient autonomy, and the limits of medical freedom
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-11_33_49-AM
Viewpoint: High-dose resveratrol supplements to extend health and life? Don’t waste your money.
Screenshot-2026-07-23-at-11.58.47-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Thought police in the UK?’ Conservatives lash out at government report calling anti-LGBQT+ narratives ‘false and misleading’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.