Researching genetically modified food “gave me so many examples of bad science that I could have spoken for three hours and still have had This slideshow could not be started. Try refreshing the page or viewing it in another browser. First, always use capital letters, because “the more capital letters you use, the more powerful your message.” “Remember that science is the enemy” when it comes to food, despite the fact that science has given the world organ transplants and iPhones. Use emotionally charged language that demonizes GMOs by invoking images of mutated animals and small farmers that have “become mindless zombies, planting whatever seed” the big corporations tell them to. Use cause-and-effect statements like “Since 1994, there has been a 400 percent increase in childhood allergies.” Since 1994, there has also been “Obamacare, the death of Princess Diana, and the Greenbay Packers have won the Super Bowl three times,” Capper writes. Finally, Capper writes, cite studies that have been rejected by the scientific community and if all else fails, invoke “the name of the evil that must be named–Monsanto.” Read the full, original story: Activism 101 – How to Write Like An Angry Internet “Expert” on GMOs
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Flattr
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link

![]() |
Infographics | More... |

Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop
![]() |
GMO FAQs | More... |

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?
![]() |
GLP Profiles | More... |

Vani Hari (Food Babe): Does inability to understand science of food make one an expert on GMOs and chemicals?
