Administration proposal to overhaul GMO regulations welcomed, but sharp divide on goals

Featured Story Banner Science Community Agrees D c x

The Obama administration said on July 2ย that it would update the way the government regulated genetically modified crops and some other biotechnology products, saying that the nearly 30-year-old system had become outdated and confusing and did not foster public confidence.

โ€œWhile the current regulatory system for biotechnology products effectively protects the health and the environment, advances in science and technology since 1992 have been altering the product landscape,โ€ John P. Holdren, the White House science adviser, and three other senior White House officials said in aย blog postย on Thursday.

They said, the complexity of the current system โ€œcan make it difficult for the public to understand how the safety of biotechnology products is evaluated, and navigating the regulatory process for these products can be unduly challenging, especially for small companies. โ€The administration said it would accept public input and hoped to complete the initial update to the regulatory framework in a year.

The existing system โ€” known as the coordinated framework โ€” was announced in 1986 and updated in 1992, at a time when genetically modified crops were not yet being marketed. The framework parceled out responsibility for regulating crops and some other products made by genetic engineering among three agencies โ€” the Agriculture Department, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration.

Critics of biotechnology crops have long said that the current system is too lax, and they will no doubt push for tougher regulations.

But some executives in the biotechnology industry and academic scientists have been saying the regulations are unnecessarily tough, making it too costly and too difficult for many academic researchers and small companies to bring genetically engineered crops to market.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post:ย White House Orders Review of Rules for Genetically Modified Crops

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-23-2026-09_20_20-PM
Kennedyโ€™s CDC blocks publication of study that shows vaccines reduce hospitalizations by 50%, then misrepresents why
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-20-2026-11_17_18-AM-2
10,000 scientists gone: Trumpโ€™s cuts create an unprecedented brain drain
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-04_31_20-PM
โ€˜Irresponsible decisionโ€™? On mandatory military flu shots, Hegseth chooses โ€˜freedomโ€™ over health
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-11-2026-11_58_46-AM
The Trump administration has run out more than 4,000 National Institutes of Health employees. Here are the consequences
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-1.14.34-PM
Latest fevered, right-wing conspiracy: Fox, New York Post, and kooky GOP legislators push โ€˜Dead Scientistsโ€™ scare
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-2-2026-03_22_54-PM
Why โ€˜support supplementsโ€™ for GLP-1 users are mostly a waste of money
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.