Concerned with Scotland’s ban, Royal Society of Edinburgh calls for rational GMO debate

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

In light of the Scottish Government’s recent decision not to permit the use of EU approved genetically modified (GM) crops in Scotland, the Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) has published an advice paper which it hopes will stimulate a rational debate on a complex issue around which there are deeply held opposing views.

On 17 August, the RSE joined nearly 30 learned societies and research institutions to sign an open letter urging the Scottish Government to reconsider its proposed ban. More recently, the RSE formed a working group of expert RSE fellows and RSE Young Academy members to consider the impact the proposed ban could have in Scotland. Their conclusions are reflected in the advisory paper now being published.

Recognising that GM technology is a contentious subject, the RSE is concerned that the Scottish Government announcement included emotive language likely to fuel negative public perceptions. In addition, there is disappointment that the announcement was presumptive; assuming hostile public opinion despite the latest evidence which shows that acceptability of GM foods is increasing.

The RSE is also concerned that the proposal was apparently made without expert scientific advice. This, the RSE believes, could mean that opportunities presented by GM technologies are not taken into account.

GM technologies may provide solutions to problems that arise in areas such as climate change, the availability of productive land and competing demands for natural resources such as fresh water.

Failure to adopt these technologies could also impact on the level of scientific research being carried out in Scotland and Scotland’s ability to attract and retain pioneering researchers.

Read full, original post: RSE Calls for a Rational GM Debate

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
covid-vaccine
Blocked by Kennedy’s CDC, validated by peer-reviewed scientists: Suppressed COVID vaccine study published in JAMA finds 50% risk cut
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Sampling_a_strawberry_32206461974
Viewpoint: Which is worse: Trace PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ on strawberries or the fear that scares people away from eating them?
NYPICHPDPICT000011561063
Viewpoint: From magnetizing your head to taking useless supplements, the wellness craze has morphed into an obsession of the affluent
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-4.08.41-PM
Even in blue states, hospitals have continued to drop gender-affirming care for youths
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-01_21_33-PM
How the dubious, Trump-backed, addictive drug kratom could enrich cabinet secretary Markwayne Mullin
Podolay_1_transplantacia_srdca_1968
From printers to pigs: The precarious future of organ transplants
Screenshot-2026-06-25-at-11.18.03-AM
Viewpoint: Appreciating a simpler past without swallowing the misleading ‘nature is healthier and safer’ myth
Screenshot-2026-06-26-at-10.14.50-AM
Viewpoint: The facts behind the grifter-promoting wellness and anti-aging peptide craze: Don’t waste your money
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-26-2026-11_34_33-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s vaccine subterfuge campaign now flies below the media radar
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.