How much of a mutant are you?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Though we should certainly stay away from mutagens like cigarette smoke and nuclear waste, mutations are something we all acquire — billions over a lifetime — because they are inevitable consequence of being alive. We are all mutants, and with recent large-scale genetic studies, scientists are gaining a better understanding of the role of mutations in our lives, and in the human population as a whole.

The term “mutation” means different things to different people, but as used by geneticists, it usually refers to newly acquired changes in our DNA. New mutations are a subset of the broader category of genetic “variants,” which include millions of DNA differences between individuals. Most of these genetic variants already exist in the human gene pool—they arose as new mutations a long time ago, and have been passed down for generations. Most of the genetic variants in our genomes are inherited from our parents, who in turn inherited their variants from their parents, and so on. These pre-existing variants are the major genetic influence on who we are, and they explain why we resemble our biological relatives.

But each of us also acquires brand-new mutations during our lives. Some of these are caused by dangerous environmental factors, like cigarette smoke. Most, however, are a byproduct of life’s most fundamental processes, small chemical accidents that occasionally mar our DNA and genetic typos that occur as our genome gets copied over and over to produce the trillions of cells of which we’re composed.

Read full, original post: Why We’re All Mutants

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-9.58.31-PM
'He seems fine': Marty Makary out as FDA commissioner
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-10.05.11-AM
Pro-vaccine “hero” vs. an anti-vax “villain”: ‘Bad Vaxx’ video stirs MAHA backlash
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challenging 
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
ChatGPT Image May 12, 2026, 10_19_00 AM 2
Viewpoint— 'Muscular governance': How authoritarianism is surging corporate-linked energy misinformation
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-05-11-104424
Hantavirus outbreak research: Trump administration shut down study last year on rodent-to-human transmission
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.