Lack of data hinders treatments for rare genetic diseases

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

I participated in a Rare Disease Day program in February at the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute in La Jolla, California. It was quite memorable.

In the United States, a rare disease is defined as one that affects fewer than 200,000 patients. Their aggregate toll is huge: There are more than 6,800 of these conditions known, affecting more than 25 million Americans. The small numbers of patients can make gathering information and designing drug studies difficult, and there are treatments available for only a couple of hundred of these diseases.

Little is known about what causes the mutations that give rise to “Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation,” or CDGs, and there are treatments for only a few. Some of the mutations are considered “very, very rare,” and are found in only dozens or hundreds of patients worldwide.

In addition to the scientific attendees and me–I was there to discuss the intersection of science, medicine and public policy–a couple dozen kids affected by CDGs and their families were in the audience.  They made a profound and indelible impact on me.

Watching the parents was difficult, too. Some were hyper-alert, asking lots of questions stimulated by having devoured every scientific paper and blog and Google article in existence; others just seemed confused.

Read full, original post: Genetic Catastrophes: A Tale Of Science, Medicine And Suffering

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.