New York Times offers lesson plan for schools on CRISPR gene editing in animals

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

[Editor’s note: The following is an introduction to a lesson plan on genetic engineering in animals  based on New York Times content from the Times’ Learning Network website]

Within the past few years scientists have revolutionized genetic engineering techniques so that now, with relative ease, they can precisely edit the genetic coding of animals more-or-less on demand. What once took decades or longer through selective breeding is now nearly instantaneous. Researchers have already produced salmon that grow faster and beef cattle with larger muscles (and therefore more meat).

The rapidly advancing field has implications not just for food production, but for slowing the spread of deadly diseases, like malaria, and protecting endangered species in the wild. But, has the sudden arrival of gene-edited animals overtaken the public discussion of their risks and benefits?

In this lesson, students will learn about the process of gene editing and consider the ethical questions inherent in tinkering with animal DNA. Then, they will debate two very different case studies of animals already engineered: fast-growing salmon and offspring-free mosquitoes. In the Going Further section, we provide resources for investigating the gene-editing process in more detail and considering the benefits and risks of additional genetic engineering applications, including editing human DNA.

See the full lesson plan here: Tinkering With Nature: Weighing the Benefits and Risks of Genetically Engineering Animals

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-10_30_14-PM
Zero: That is the official American measles death toll for 2026. Here is what RFK Jr.’s CDC leaves out.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-11_36_25-AM
How the reckless AI race among Anthropic, OpenAI and China spawned today’s safety crisis
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_24_17-AM
Bayer urges court to approve $7.25 billion Monsanto Roundup settlement that could limit its future liabilities
screenshot at  am
‘Glyphosate is not carcinogenic’: Independent EU chemical oversight agency reaffirms—for the 3rd time in 9 years—that the herbicide is safe-as-used
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-10.52.30-AM
AI is being used in dangerous bioscience experiments
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-3.07.56-PM
Trump EPA rolls back power-plant climate rules—and moves to block future carbon limits
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-02_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: 6 Atlantic Council expert opinions on the U.S., China and the AI safety crisis
Screenshot-2026-08-04-at-11.36.16-AM
Viewpoint: Emotion-driven stories of doctors allegedly ignoring patient concerns are driving vaccine hesitancy
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-13-2026-10_46_11-AM
“Hit the brakes”: Anthropic warns the race to superintelligence could spawn internet-seizing AI swarms—and empower authoritarians. Here’s how to stop it.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2026-01_57_57-PM
Anthropic claims to thwart AI-based cyberattacks, surveillance, and biological weapons research
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-14-2026-11_16_47-AM
Fibermaxxing: Latest Instagram diet craze raises hope that a fiber-rich diet can improve health
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.