How useful are cancer gene tests?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

The cancer genetics startup Color GenomicsĀ is announcing that it will expand its test for breast and ovarian cancer genes to include a total of 30, including genes related to pancreatic, stomach, colon, and prostate cancer.

Color stands out among the field because of its price: $249. That’s cheap enough to leapfrog insurance companies, the traditional gatekeepers of genetic tests. Insurance typically only covers genetic tests for cancer—which can run to over a thousand dollars among Color’s competitors—if a patient has risk factors like family history of cancer at a young age. Color also helpfully refers would-be customers to doctors to order the test. ā€œHistorically the test has been very expensive, and the process to get testing meant jumping through lots of loops,ā€ says president and cofounder Othman Laraki. ā€œWe want for access to no longer be a barrier.ā€

It’s easy to nod along: More access, more genes, more tests all sound like much-needed defenses in the interminable war against cancer. But doctors caution that our ability to sequence DNA—to build machines that can manipulate DNA samples at scale and write code that can assemble gene sequences—has far outpaced our ability to understand how those genes cause cancer. Most of the 30 genes on Color’s panel or the 25 genes on Myriad’s panelĀ or 32 genes on GeneDx’s panel? They don’t matter enough to be useful.

Read full, original post:Ā A single $249 test analyzes 30 cancer genes. But do you need it?

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Open-Menthol-Cigarette-Pack
How the tobacco industry conspired with conservative activists to kill the Biden administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettesĀ 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointā€”ā€œMiracle moleculeā€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Cross and Syringe Standoff
Viewpoint: Hijacking Jesus: How anti-vaccine fanatics are exploiting religious exemptions and killing children
Caution-Taped-Fresh-Produce-Aisle
Should we be afraid of our food?
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-12.18.57-PM
5 deaths, 1,000 reported cases: These horrific numbers underestimate the consequences of the anti-vax movement
Profile and Vaccination Portraits
Convinced COVID shots cause widespread harm, Kennedy plans federal initiative to incentivize doctors to report alleged injuries
Screenshot-2026-10-11-at-10.24.21-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s new CDC head Erica Schwartz greenlights hepatitis B vaccine study critics call ā€œunethical and designed to cast doubts on its safetyā€
Personalized-Cancer-mRNA-Vaccine-Vial
Personalized mRNA vaccines are poised to revolutionize cancer treatments. Here are the barriers.
Screenshot 2026-10-12 at 12.25
Tearful onions? CRISPR has a solution for that
Screenshot-2026-10-05-at-11.57.44-AM
Scaremongering or legitimate safety concerns? The political dogfight over America’s food safety system
Deepfake Democracy Media Mosaic
31 states have passed a patchwork of laws to limit election deepfake commercials. They’re not working very well.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.