Senate working on ‘middle ground’ GMO labeling bill to prevent Vermont law

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Any proposal from Sen. Debbie Stabenow on how best to preempt Vermont’s GMO labeling law needs to get sign-off from agriculture and food groups in order to be successful, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Pat Roberts told reporters [May 9]. Roberts said he is still unclear what Stabenow is willing to agree to in order to set a national standard on GMOs.

“I want two things: A. I want to know what it is, and B. I want to see it vetted,” Roberts said. “It should be vetted with the canola producers in her state, or for that matter sugar beets or whatever. We can’t get anywhere unless the majority of the 800 that came in on behalf of our bill — or for that matter the advocacy groups — but most importantly by all the crops that are now being affected. So I’d like it to be something that’s been vetted. Should that be the case I’m ready to go.”

Staff from both lawmakers are still hashing out details for a bill with the aim of getting something to the floor before Vermont’s law takes effect July 1. Backing from the industry will be crucial to get lawmakers from both sides on board, the Kansas Republican said, adding, “If it goes too far to get 25 Democrats, I’ll lose 20-30 Republicans. Vet it.”

Read full, original post: Roberts on Dems’ GMO bill: Vet it!

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-11.32.12-AM
Viewpoint: Trump appoints climate change hoax promoter to head influential government policy project
Screenshot 2026-07-16 at 8.49
Pete Hegseth’s bizarre Viagra commercial as Trump administration endorses ‘hormone replacement therapy’
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-6.02.54-PM
Wellness grifters overwhelm information channels in the developing world, and the problem is escalating
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-02_39_22-PM
Viewpoint: Polyphenols or NAD+ supplements to combat aging: No, Gwenyth Paltrow and followers, don’t waste your money.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-1-2026-03_33_49-PM
‘Alternative’ cancer treatments that could kill you
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-12.08.38-PM
Viewpoint: With trust in doctors and mainstream medicine collapsing, medical professionals need a new communications strategy
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
afb-a-b
As the EU loosens restrictions on agricultural gene editing, it remains years behind the rest of the world on equally-safe GMO foods
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Misinformation alert: No, glyphosate use in Canadian forests is not spurring more wildfires
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-8.33.45-AM
US court revives 550 lawsuits claiming Tylenol causes autism and ADHD. What does this ruling mean for science and the law?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.