23andMe: Alt-right mistaken, DNA tests can’t ‘prove their whiteness’

eb d z
[Credit: Martin via Flickr]

With three weeks left until the election, it is already safe to call the 2016 election one of the craziest in US history. From Donald Trump’s shocking win of the GOP nomination to the success of third party candidate Gary Johnson, this election cycle has been one surprise after another. But possibly nothing has been more unpredictable than the rise of the ultra right-wing group the ‘alt-right.’ The group has gone from hiding in internet chatrooms to bursting into mainstream America –all on the back of Trump’s campaign.

If you’re unfamiliar with the ‘alt-right,’ US News and World Report describes it like this:

The alt-right is built around the belief that evolutionary biology shows that white people and black people are biologically and genetically different, and that this evolved over time…The second (and perhaps equally important) concept at the heart of the alt-right movement is the belief that America was, is and should be a nation for white people. It isn’t just “nationalist,” the fuzzy term that most political reporters use to describe Trump and his alt-right legion, or what Clinton was referring to when she undiplomatically described Trump’s “basket of deplorables.” It’s that white people must put America first – for white people.

altrightrisingAs you might imagine, if you traffic in alt-right circles, proving your ‘whiteness’ is essential. So it shouldn’t be surprising that members of the movement are using genetic testing to “prove their whiteness” to win bragging rights within the movement and establish their place in the American white elite.

But as alt-righters eagerly await their genetic results, 23andMe says they are interpreting them wrong. The company’s ancestry testing gives a percentage of regional origin based on large swathes of each person’s genome, like sub-Saharan African, South American or European. But those ancestral roots don’t correspond directly to race.

In fact, 23andMe says they do not report any race-related information. In questionnaires that accompany the genetic tests, users can volunteer their race. 23andMe has used that self-identification information combined with ancestry results for some interesting research. From Elspeth Reeve who broke the story on VICE:

“As much as 10 percent of European-Americans from the South carry small levels of African ancestry, a few percent,” [23andMe population geneticist Kasia] Bryc said, based on the company’s study of 160,000 customers. Those with less than 28 percent African ancestry were more likely to identify as white, and those with more were more likely to identify as black.

Race and ancestry genetics have a long and sordid history. It’s still complicated. Social scientists and geneticists agree that this issue is not black or white. Again from VICE:

Terence Keel, an assistant professor of history and black studies at the University of California–Santa Barbara, studies the relationship between culture and race within science. He says these present-day white nationalists are reproducing very old ideas about race, perhaps due to anxiety about their place in the social order in an era of the first black president. “Geneticists, after looking at the human genome, realized something we’ve thought for a while, which is there’s not a direct correlation between the external things we see — height, skin color — and the genes,” Keel said. “Once we sequenced the genome, we also discovered humans are about 99.98 percent the same.” Only about 10 percent of genetic variation is between what we traditionally think of as races.

Alt-righters also prove they understand the self-identification component to race when they argue if Finnish, Jewish or Spanish people are “white.” They see ‘whiteness’ as a fluid concept as they debate whether these groups are in or out. Some alt-righters are naturally disappointed in their results. As VICE reported one chatroom participant consoled a peer by suggesting his non-European ancestry was the result of rape, from VICE:

“Oy vey. My ancestry dna results are back,” Eagles wrote, linking to a chart showing 7 percent African ancestry and 22 percent Native American. Someone reassured him, suggesting he hadn’t come by the genes by choice: “There is no way that anyone’s lineage avoided rape. While there is no way to prove that, I am positive it’s true.” Another said he was “deffo mostly White.”

In a 2013 episode of The Trisha Show, genetic testing revealed that white supremacist Craig Cobb was ‘only 86 percent white’:

Related article:  Humans who can't feel pain pointing way to non-addictive painkillers

At the end of the segment, Cobb brushes away the results, claiming they are ‘statistical noise’ and ‘short science.’ His reaction is in stark contrast to what some black Americans are using genetic testing to discover their origins Ethan Chiel writes at Fusion. Some African Americans have used genetic testing to explore their ethnic origins, parts of which are often unknown because they were lost due to enslavement of their ancestors and the sexual violence they experienced:

It’s the inverse of what young black Americans are doing with the genetic tests, which my colleague Cara DeFabio wrote about a couple of weeks ago. Testers of African descent are using Ancestry.com and 23andMe to try and learn about their family via genetics because there often aren’t records of where their more distant ancestors were from before America. For them, evidence of European ancestry that dates to the 1700s and 1800s can be traumatic, the proof in their DNA that their enslaved ancestors were likely raped by the people who bought and sold them.

Other alt-righters have created a conspiracy theory suggesting that 23andMe falsifies ‘aryan peoples’ results to include DNA from other ancestral lines to coerce people into supporting diversity. From Elspeth Reeve at VICE:

When I asked [23andMe populiation geneticst] Bryc about this conspiracy theory, she was shocked. “We have an algorithm. It’s a very robust machine learning algorithm, and what the results are, are the results that you get.” Andy Kill, who works in media relations for 23andMe, stepped in: “We can unequivocally deny that. 100 percent.”

Genetics does have an actual race problem, however, in that the majority of testing for research has been done with people with European ancestry. 23andMe was just awarded a $1.7 million grant to develop a panel of genetic tests for people of primarily non-European descent to address disparity.

Meredith Knight is a frequent contributor to the Genetic Literacy Project. She is a freelance science and health writer based in Austin, Texas. Follow her @Meremereknight

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend