How Berkeley-led academics conspired with anti-GMO groups to attack Food Evolution movie

x propaganda

A University of California Berkeley PhD candidate wrote a widely publicized letter attacking the science documentary Food Evolution in June (signed by more than 40 other academics) at the behest of the very groups exposed in the film, without disclosing her connection, emails released on Muckrock.com show.

Ka ZdiBoQp d NxJXnQ
Maywa Montenegro

[Read Kevin Folta’s response to the campaign by 45 academics and food journalists to discredit the Food Evolution movie.]

These groups (Pesticide Action Network, Center for Food Safety, Small Planet Institute, and Friends of the Earth) all collaborated with Maywa Montenegro on the drafting of this letter and promoting its dissemination afterwards. These organizations share close ties with the organic industry (according to ActivistFacts.com both Patagonia and Ben & Jerry’s) with a vested interest in the continued demonization of biotech crops.

[Read the GLP’s profiles on Pesticide Action Network, Center for Food Safety, and Friends of the Earth.]

CHU K W c X CARJquRBA

The film had been previewed by members of the Pesticide Action Network in preparation for a panel debate, but Maywa Montenegro appeared to not have seen the movie herself.

One Berkeley professor who signed the letter, Miguel Altieri (one of the few to have seen the film), made it clear in an email that his intent was to silence any information that does not fit the anti-GMO narrative.

Maya the question is not more conversations and clarifications about GMOs….. The issue is to take a more radical position like Via Campesina , SOCLA and others of total rejection of the technology….

Another, University Vermont Professor Ernesto Mendez, imagined a 100% independently developed transgenic crop resistant to drought conditions. He insinuated that such a crop should not be developed in case “powerful corporate interests” appropriated the technology.

UC Davis Professor Alison Van Eenennaam appeared at length in the film and was disappointed in the letter. She described it in a blog post as “the actual definition of confirmation bias”.

As academics, shouldn’t you see/analyze something before you offer a detailed critique? I have not yet seen your movie but I offer the following criticisms…..

Molecular Biology Professor Kevin Folta from the University of Florida expressed concern about how the letter makes his academic colleagues look.

As a university administrator, I really have to question the judgment of these folks. Would you sign your name to a public document that says climate change is a hoax? Would you sign your name to a public document that says vaccines cause autism? Here they are trashing a technology that the National Academies clearly states has more benefit than risk by far, is not harmful to health and has important, manageable environmental impacts we need to address.

The majority of academics appear to be aware that the letter in question was co-authored by these Berkeley xactivist groups as the email from the Pesticide Action Network was shared on many of the email listservs they are a part of. None have shared public concern over the incorrect promotion of the letter being authored solely by a Berkeley PhD candidate.

Related article:  The Buzz: 6 reasons not to worry about the bees

They were, however, warned by Carnegie Mellon Professor John Soluri about being “intellectually lazy and strategically silly” for not having evaluated the film by actually watching it.

ILy NMf bB s GriKT xvw

Neither Ms. Montenegro, nor the Pesticide Action Network, have responded to my request for comment.

A version of this article appeared on Medium as “PhD candidate failed to disclose activist connection in letter attacking science film” and has been republished here with permission from the author. 

Stephan Neidenbach is a middle school teacher in Annapolis, Maryland.  He runs the Facebook group We Love GMOs and Vaccines. Follow him on Twitter @welovegv.

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Nigeriacotton

Video: We can ‘finally’ grow GMOs—Nigerian farmer explains why developing countries need biotech crops

Nigerian farmer Patience Koku discusses the GMO crop trials she is conducting on her farm, and why growers can "rise ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
cow global warming

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend