Viewpoint: Consumers fear GMOs because ‘Big Food’ companies bombard them with misinformation

Screen Shot at PM

[Editor’s note: Omri Ben-Shahar is a law professor at the University of Chicago and the author of the book More Than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure.]

[T]he present wave of food claims is no longer constrained even by the ethics of half-truth. Companies are relentlessly trumpeting their products’ purity from one ingredient that they know full well does not harm consumers or public health, to hide the simple fact their food is largely unhealthy.

This trendy villain is GMO—food produced from genetically engineered crops. Consumers fear food containing GMO ingredients, despite mountains of scientifically unchallenged evidence that there is nothing to fear. Why do people fear? Because they are bombarded by misleading claims about potential risks from GMO foods. Some of these claims come from activist groups, who cynically masquerade their politics (concerns over property rights in food production) with disingenuous claims of health and sustainability risks. But the majority of the misleading claims fed to consumers now come from Big Food.

I used to think that it’s unfair to blame food makers for flaunting the Non-GMO labels. … But I have come to realize that the Dannons, Deans, and Chipotles of the world are not just a symptom of the popular misinformation, but are now very much its cause. By trying to jazz up their otherwise mediocre and non-descript products through loud campaigns against GMO, these companies are taking a misperception that preexisted in the margins and pushing it into the mainstream.

Read full, original post: The Great “Non-GMO” Deception: How To Sell Politically Correct Chocolate Chip Cookies

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend